Beat the Blazers

[nuraman00]

 

[nuraman00]

or holy smokes

Today is Earth Day, not that other day from two days ago.

 

[nuraman00]

There you go admitting it again! What you Robotically just sounded like to all humans:

I wish this clip didn't have the watermark. It would be funnier.

 

[Sackataters]

John looks erotic there, it's a disturbing image.

 

[Sackataters]

Is that a one liter on the side of your leg or are you happy to see me.

 

[nuraman00]

Is that a one liter on the side of your leg or are you happy to see me.

LOL.

 

[nuraman00]

Is that a one liter on the side of your leg or are you happy to see me.

Show it to Mrs. Sackataters. She might want you to have that same pose, later.

 

[nuraman00]

You see! This is what I was complaining about with the freakin' NHL standings! Why the F do they list games played and not just the damn records?!!! Here, with your awful (kidding) formatting, it looked like the 2 was the wins and the 1 was the losses and I ignored the next 1. I didn't bother to look at the percentages in the same lines...

What's worse is that I saw "2-1" from the first year and "1-0" from the second year, not "2-1" and "1-1" respectively, as I would have if I had the columns consistent. Had your list just said "1-1 .500" and "0-1 .000," it would have been clear, no mistakes, no misreads, and most importantly, no marshmallow chicken butterflies.

Either way, I wouldn't have paid attention to the winning percentages for each year, because that'd be cheating. And only cream cheese wafflers cheat, and I ain't no cream cheese waffler. And I'm no robot, either! It takes one to know one and one (you) should know when one isn't!

Can you explain either:

1. What these are, if they're food items.

2. If they refer to something funny, what the reference is?