- Thread starter
- #1
They didnt look that bad, that Couture loss is massive but much easier to manage then Martin's loss. Atleast the guys replacing couture have some NHL time, all the candidates who replaced Martin did not
They just need to leave Mueller in the AHL till mid season then bring him up, by then he should be ready for bottom 6 minutes, I'm in favor of benching Dillion over Mueller, Tennyson has been serviceable and I'm not a fan of the guy. Maybe Dwilly can swing a trade involving Dillion for a better #5yep. Cooch hurts, particuarly on the PP. But, its all about defense and goaltending. Jones was respectable (though a couple stoppable goals), but martin back takes dillon back from a #1 pairing to a #3 pairing. He only cost the team one goal there, instead of more. When martin was out, dillon was playing 22+ mins/gm, and it was killing the team at both ends for over a 1/3 of the game, while also killing burnsie. Dillon's promotion was virtually singlehandedly killing the sharks in all areas by F-ing up 2 of the 3 Dpairings, killing the #1 dman's game, and killing the PK and second PP, all places where martin excels. last night, dillon was back to his 3rd pairing 16-18 mins/gm where he is matched up against the losers on the other team and hidden to minimize his damage.
I would feel much much better if the sharks had a solid 5th defenseman, who is capable of top 4 minutes. The injury bug among the top 4 will strike again, and when it does another tailspin is likely. Dougie needs to figure out how to add another solid defenseman just in case as having Dillon, Tennyson and Mueller in the lineup every night is guaranteed to kill the team. Only 1/3 of the game is an AHL lever Dman NOT on the ice then.
Not a lot after signing Frazier McclarenHow much cap space do they have? Theres gotta be some stay at home vets out there that can be had for cheap
Same thing I said, they had 1mil in cap space and signed himLOL why did they sign him again??
Same thing I said, they had 1mil in cap space and signed him
As bad is the Dillion deal seem to be right it's not even close to the Hamilton dealFirst, Mclaren is on a 2-way deal and thus counts nothing against the cap, unless he is called up.
second, what you see is what you get for at least the next 30-40 games on D, just pray for no injury. i would be totally and completely shocked to see Dillon moved. As terrible as he seems to be, and as head scratchingly stupid as his deal appears, dougie signed himm for 5 yrs, 15M and that's too much to move easily. They also wont be willing to just dump him for space at this point in the year.
If the D suffers a key injury or somehow falters and none of the kids steps up (mueller could be a different players after 30 games playing 22-24 mins/night in the cuda), then the trade deadline would be the time to be buying. A rental would be next to impossible and dougie is not gunna bark up that road again. They already don't have a 1st rounder next year, but if the forwards are virtually all healthy come january/February, then the top 3 lines will be overcrowded: jumbo, pavs, cooch, patty, ward, donskoi, hertl, nieto, karlsson, wingels, torres, Goldobin = 12 forwards with top 9 skill (smith, Goodrow, brown = 3 clear 4th liners). Add in a few other guys who might be ready within a year or two (namely: Jevpalovs, sadowy, meier, o'regan, etc) and the forwards would seem to be the best trading pieces dougie has.
However, it's too early to make such a move unless a great player fell in your If Ana continues to totally suck and was willing to part with one of their kids (lindholm or vatanen would look sweet in teal) for help up front, then of course the phone would be on earlier, but that's wholly unlikely. Only nearing the deadline will teams that are pretty much out or teams that are desperate for top 9 talent be willing to move a good Dman.
Dougie would also likely only target a good Dman who is sub-30 and can play for the team this year and well beyond. Calgary is chalk full of good young D and thin on O (like ANA), so that's a possibility, but not too many of the contending teams are likely to be willing to part with a young dman.
I wouldn't hold my breath, but the season is long and the possibilities are always there. This is doubly true if the sharks find that some of the young kids who they call up (like goldobin) play well enough to emerge as legit top 9 forwards (Kinda like karlsson and tierney did last year). If so, Nieto definitely could be on the block and might fetch a respectable return if paired with another of the young D like Mueller or Demelo and a mid round pick. Who knows, but dougie has gotta see the thinness on D from the 3 games without martin. Its obvious that Defensive depth is the #1 issue.
As bad is the Dillion deal seem to be right it's not even close to the Hamilton deal