ellupo
Well-Known Member
The players get nothing out of the games? A dumb or naive comment.No, it isn't.
There are two parts to this:
1) Your hilarious misinterpretation of making money off football = sick, what I call sick is purposefully changing rules so all the benefits that you get would be financially-based is sick, as that is self-centered. No excuse for it. Making money off of football though because you earned that spot isn't sick. That's just common sense. Ohio State has not earned a CFP spot yet the B1G will make sure they do because of money. If money is the reason instead of a bonus then there shouldn't be criticism.
2) "countless" already ignoring dumb figurative language being used here, what jobs are being accounted for? The board? The department? The coaches? They're already well-paid enough, in fact, more than enough in many cases. Or simply they use millions of dollars to utilize and advance their own facilities and equipment? We all know how this game is played, only a sliver fraction of the money these schools get goes to scholarships.
That's the thing, there wouldn't be a chance that this would happen, right now. Let me explain: There's no basis to where I am wrong, as the point I made was that the Big Ten would only care for whoever has the best chances to make the playoffs, this is why they changed rules for Ohio State to get another game & chance. A 5-0 Rutgers in front of the division would not get this treatment as I'd bet my kidney they would not be ranked #4 as of now. You say I am wrong, but that would be assuming Rutgers would be recognized with the same prestige as Ohio State, which obviously isn't true to anyone. This has happened before. 2016. A team rightfully wins their division and conference, but did the B1G push them for the playoffs? No. They went with Ohio State who had a better chance. I think you know the incident I'm referring to fully well, and it's that exact incident as to why the counter of "Big Ten would've made the same decision for any other team" isn't being truthful at all. Face it. Indiana-Northwestern Championship Game gets played, will they both be ranked above Ohio State in the end? If your answer is yes, then your claim that the Big Ten would've made the change for anyone would be consistent, if your answer is no, then you're lying to yourself with your original claim.
Yes, it is up to the committee to make the right choice, do I think they will? No, honestly speaking.
Victim of what exactly? A boob who comes at me with dishonest counters? I believe I've had my fair share of that plenty enough. My last statement was rather a statement of expectation that I rustled a Buckeyes fan jimmies enough to the point where they respond back to me with the inaccurate claim of "yeah the conference would totally die on the Rutgers hill instead of the Ohio State hill" and you did not disappoint sir.
Yes countless as in I do not the number but you limiting it to those that are "already well-paid enough" is once again dumb and naive. You forget about the all of the support staff.
You say Rutgers would not get the same treatment, prove that statement correct. Right now it just sounds like some sour grapes from a butt hurt fan. The issue you are speaking of was the CFP committee, not the B1G. Apples to oranges.
Yes victim. Started a victim and continued the victim.