- Thread starter
- #41
msgkings322
I'm just here to troll everyone
More defense even if the pitching wasn’t there. JHL made a catch that saved the game and it wasn’t easy. Chapman more GG level play. Etc
Don’t exaggerate. They are playing .857 ball so on pace for a 139-23 record. Keep it realTough game and not pretty but still on pace for a decent 161-1 season.
Way to keep us grounded, msg.Don’t exaggerate. They are playing .857 ball so on pace for a 139-23 record. Keep it real
I left as I was clearly jinxing JV.Busy at work and totally forgot about the game today.
Just turned it on about 10 mins ago.
You’re welcome.
Moundshittery...checkYep mentally ill
Also Chapman and Ramos both had outstanding games at the plate.
You’re one of my favorite alts but your analysis of games is dogshit lol
I have a very hard time classifying a 10-run game as “batdouchery”Moundshittery...check
Mittfuckery....check
Batdouchery....check
What about that is incorrect? We won, great. In small doses 10-9 games are ok, great.
This game was a SHIT.....SHOW.
Only someone in full flight from reality would disagree.
I refer you to the bottom of the 9th...the bottom of the 10thI have a very hard time classifying a 10-run game as “batdouchery”
That would be akin to classifying a no-hitter as “moundshitery” because he had 2 walks a couple pitches that went to the backstop.
Yeah that’s part of your dumb analysis, one or two half innings and you say the whole game sucked for hitting. When they scored 10 runs. You also specifically called out a guy who went 2 for 4 with 2 walks and a HR and a guy who went 3 for 5 with a walk and an RBI as having bad games at the plate.I refer you to the bottom of the 9th...the bottom of the 10th
Unfortunately the Philth are another team better than us LOL. But they should win that division so not competing with them for a wildcard spotGreat news! The Dodgers finally lost a game last night to the Philth!
I didn't say "the whole game sucked for hitting."Yeah that’s part of your dumb analysis, one or two half innings and you say the whole game sucked for hitting. When they scored 10 runs. You also specifically called out a guy who went 2 for 4 with 2 walks and a HR and a guy who went 3 for 5 with a walk and an RBI as having bad games at the plate.
Object all you want, the whole board knows your post game analyses are often suspect. Baseball is a game of failure especially for hitters where 7 out of 10 times you make an out and that’s a great career. It’s no big deal dude, you have your style and opinions, and we clown them if we feel like it. You’re still a good alt.
LOL ‘KI didn't say "the whole game sucked for hitting."
Straw man much?
I said there was batdouchery. There was.
I didn't say either of those guys had "bad games at the plate."
I said there was batdouchery. There was.
This really isn't hard to follow, unless you're delusional and adding in things I didn't say to argue against.
By that measure, than, let’s all agree now that batdouchery exists in every single game. In every single inning.I didn't say "the whole game sucked for hitting."
Straw man much?
I said there was batdouchery. There was.
I didn't say either of those guys had "bad games at the plate."
I said there was batdouchery. There was.
This really isn't hard to follow, unless you're delusional and adding in things I didn't say to argue against.
I rather enjoyed the game. Even with all the professionals occasionally doing bad things.By that measure, than, let’s all agree now that batdouchery exists in every single game. In every single inning.
Can we just go with that assumption as the baseline moving forward? I will stop saying “baseball is game played on a field with 9 fielders, a batter and the potential of up to 3 base runners” (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played) and you can stop referring to “batdouchery” which doesn’t apply to the entire game, but only certain points in the game (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played).
Deal?