Game Thread: April 4 2025 - JV pitches home opener vs Seattle

[msgkings322]

More defense even if the pitching wasn’t there. JHL made a catch that saved the game and it wasn’t easy. Chapman more GG level play. Etc

 

[sf1giantfan]

Tough game and not pretty but still on pace for a decent 161-1 season.

 

[msgkings322]

Tough game and not pretty but still on pace for a decent 161-1 season.

Don’t exaggerate. They are playing .857 ball so on pace for a 139-23 record. Keep it real

 

[LHG]

Don’t exaggerate. They are playing .857 ball so on pace for a 139-23 record. Keep it real

Way to keep us grounded, msg.

 

[tzill]

Busy at work and totally forgot about the game today.

Just turned it on about 10 mins ago.

You’re welcome.

I left as I was clearly jinxing JV.

 

[tzill]

Yep mentally ill

Also Chapman and Ramos both had outstanding games at the plate.

You’re one of my favorite alts but your analysis of games is dogshit lol

Moundshittery...check
Mittfuckery....check
Batdouchery....check

What about that is incorrect? We won, great. In small doses 10-9 games are ok, great.

This game was a SHIT.....SHOW.

Only someone in full flight from reality would disagree.

 

[calsnowskier]

Moundshittery...check
Mittfuckery....check
Batdouchery....check

What about that is incorrect? We won, great. In small doses 10-9 games are ok, great.

This game was a SHIT.....SHOW.

Only someone in full flight from reality would disagree.

I have a very hard time classifying a 10-run game as “batdouchery”

That would be akin to classifying a no-hitter as “moundshitery” because he had 2 walks a couple pitches that went to the backstop.

 

[Stokes1931]

Great news! The Dodgers finally lost a game last night to the Philth!

 

[tzill]

I have a very hard time classifying a 10-run game as “batdouchery”

That would be akin to classifying a no-hitter as “moundshitery” because he had 2 walks a couple pitches that went to the backstop.

I refer you to the bottom of the 9th...the bottom of the 10th

 

[msgkings322]

I refer you to the bottom of the 9th...the bottom of the 10th

Yeah that’s part of your dumb analysis, one or two half innings and you say the whole game sucked for hitting. When they scored 10 runs. You also specifically called out a guy who went 2 for 4 with 2 walks and a HR and a guy who went 3 for 5 with a walk and an RBI as having bad games at the plate.

Object all you want, the whole board knows your post game analyses are often suspect. Baseball is a game of failure especially for hitters where 7 out of 10 times you make an out and that’s a great career. It’s no big deal dude, you have your style and opinions, and we clown them if we feel like it. You’re still a good alt.

 

[msgkings322]

Great news! The Dodgers finally lost a game last night to the Philth!

Unfortunately the Philth are another team better than us LOL. But they should win that division so not competing with them for a wildcard spot

 

[tzill]

Yeah that’s part of your dumb analysis, one or two half innings and you say the whole game sucked for hitting. When they scored 10 runs. You also specifically called out a guy who went 2 for 4 with 2 walks and a HR and a guy who went 3 for 5 with a walk and an RBI as having bad games at the plate.

Object all you want, the whole board knows your post game analyses are often suspect. Baseball is a game of failure especially for hitters where 7 out of 10 times you make an out and that’s a great career. It’s no big deal dude, you have your style and opinions, and we clown them if we feel like it. You’re still a good alt.

I didn't say "the whole game sucked for hitting."

Straw man much?

I said there was batdouchery. There was.

I didn't say either of those guys had "bad games at the plate."

I said there was batdouchery. There was.

This really isn't hard to follow, unless you're delusional and adding in things I didn't say to argue against.

 

[msgkings322]

I didn't say "the whole game sucked for hitting."

Straw man much?

I said there was batdouchery. There was.

I didn't say either of those guys had "bad games at the plate."

I said there was batdouchery. There was.

This really isn't hard to follow, unless you're delusional and adding in things I didn't say to argue against.

LOL ‘K

 

[calsnowskier]

I didn't say "the whole game sucked for hitting."

Straw man much?

I said there was batdouchery. There was.

I didn't say either of those guys had "bad games at the plate."

I said there was batdouchery. There was.

This really isn't hard to follow, unless you're delusional and adding in things I didn't say to argue against.

By that measure, than, let’s all agree now that batdouchery exists in every single game. In every single inning.

Can we just go with that assumption as the baseline moving forward? I will stop saying “baseball is game played on a field with 9 fielders, a batter and the potential of up to 3 base runners” (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played) and you can stop referring to “batdouchery” which doesn’t apply to the entire game, but only certain points in the game (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played).

Deal?

 

[filosofy29]

mentally ill and delusional. Sounds like we have some alts.

 

[filosofy29]

By that measure, than, let’s all agree now that batdouchery exists in every single game. In every single inning.

Can we just go with that assumption as the baseline moving forward? I will stop saying “baseball is game played on a field with 9 fielders, a batter and the potential of up to 3 base runners” (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played) and you can stop referring to “batdouchery” which doesn’t apply to the entire game, but only certain points in the game (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played).

Deal?

I rather enjoyed the game. Even with all the professionals occasionally doing bad things.

 

[tzill]

By that measure, than, let’s all agree now that batdouchery exists in every single game. In every single inning.

Can we just go with that assumption as the baseline moving forward? I will stop saying “baseball is game played on a field with 9 fielders, a batter and the potential of up to 3 base runners” (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played) and you can stop referring to “batdouchery” which doesn’t apply to the entire game, but only certain points in the game (a given that we all know and that applies to every game ever played).

Deal?

No, that overstates it. Not every failing is batdouchery.

Runner at third, no outs and strikeout -- batdouchery.

Runner at third, no outs and liner to short -- you got basebaled

 

[tzill]

I rather enjoyed the game. Even with all the professionals occasionally doing bad things.

As is your right.

Not my type of game. Over 162 there will be a few of these. Over 162 there will be a few 2-1 games with great defense. We can all get what we want.

 

[calsnowskier]

As is your right.

Not my type of game. Over 162 there will be a few of these. Over 162 there will be a few 2-1 games with great defense. We can all get what we want.

If we are to take your posts at face value, than there would be about 152 douchey games per season in your eyes.

hey, it doesn’t bother me. I rather enjoy it (to a point). But don’t try to defend it as anything more than a crazed fan’s rantings.

 

[sf1giantfan]

If we lost 10-0, didn’t hit and blew chances to score then a batdouchery it would be. But to be honest I don’t even think it is a real word.