idseer
Well-Known Member
Yes, those 12-0 seasons certainly prove that he is a lousy coach. Why couldn’t he be as good as Willingham or Davie. The funny thing is that not only do I think he had a good year, but the AP writers and the Home Depot coach’s award were both given to Kelly. Crazy that nobody seems to realize that he did a lousy job this year. Just you. I hope he is just as lousy next year, and the year after that. But good news for you that game day genius Bob Davie finished the year with a 3-9 record at New Mexico. Hard to believe that a game day genius could finish with a 3-9 record while a lousy game day coach goes 12-0 and is in the playoff. I think we all know you’re upset that the AP writers passed on Davie for coach of the year.
you see why it's hard to discuss anything with you? you are what we call ... FULL OF SHIT! you included 2 lies in your childish diatribe here. you said i'm upset davie wasn't picked over kelly and you suggest i think kelly did a lousy job this year. why should anyone discuss anything with you when you do this? perhaps you think you're just being clever?
here's the thing about awards. they are often given without real regard for who might be best at something. only on who, as i suggested earlier in this thread, has the most success (maybe 'surprising' success is more apt). they couldn't give it to saban because ... he's expected to be good. not heupel because he's not well known. they know there's lots more giddy notre dame fans (like you) than ucf has. are you naive enough to think the ap doesn't consider things like this (silly question i know)?
you've wasted a lot of your time today trying to smear me with lies and other garbage you create. and all because mi gave my opinion of kelly's award.
maybe you should put your time to better use? throw a party for your friends at notre dame. invite your old buddies and talk over good times about when you went there.