I disagree.
They are way way way worse than their record shows this year.
Check out some fancy/advanced stats if you care. They grossly overachieved the whole season.
If they get past the Wings (they really shouldn't have), they're toast the next round.
Check out some fancy/advanced stats if you care. They grossly overachieved the whole season.
Yes, please. Ducks are really not a great (good?) team...
Yes, they are. You know when they weren't a good team? 2009.
I disagree.
They are way way way worse than their record shows this year.
Check out some fancy/advanced stats if you care. They grossly overachieved the whole season.
If they get past the Wings (they really shouldn't have), they're toast the next round.
I'd say that is mostly correct, except with only a 48 game schedule in place, those Fenwick numbers and shooting percentages may not regress to the mean as they statistically should. I wouldn't say they're way worse, just a little bit lucky statistically speaking.
Oh, is this another bullshit Corsi and Fenwick conversation-starter about unsustainable shooting percentages? Because I'm not really interested in reading math about why the team who went 3-0 against the Blackhawks this season is really a bottom-eight club.
Your hockey team sucks because of math!
I'm kidding. You guys were, like, fifth best in the league. Just a few spots below New Jersey. Yay, advanced stats!