miah
Well Hung Member
Yep, there MAY be but they're not. Speculation is weak at best in sports. They are. Jus the facts......There may be several teams that would go undefeated with that schedule.
Yep, there MAY be but they're not. Speculation is weak at best in sports. They are. Jus the facts......There may be several teams that would go undefeated with that schedule.
The point for the OP though is the system is designed so that if UW isn't legit they will either still lose before selection or at least lose in the first round. People can debate on whether 4 is enough or not and whether good teams get left out and those are valid points of discussion, but it is the system we have. Yes, the conference is down this year and we expected as much. You had only 4 teams in the entire conference returning a starting QB and 3 of them are now at the top of the conference. It's not hard to do that math. A whole lot of teams paying that price. With so many young QB's though, imagine the pac in two years. Nearly everyone will have seasoned veteran QB's.
It really doesn't matter how easy their schedule has been. The system in place rewards them just for being in a P5 and not losing any games. If they find a way to reach 13-0 they are in, whether or not they have proven they belong. And it doesn't matter if people think Ohio state or other teams left out might be better.
Did you even read the OP ? Perhaps you can go get an adult to read it for you and then explain it....
Here is a clue to your current stupidity:
Rutgers- 2-7, 0-6 Big 10
Idaho- 5-4, 3-2 Sunbelt
Portland St. 3-6,
Arizona 2-7, 0-6 Pac 12
Stanford 6-3, 4-3 Pac12 (this team played a bunch of cupcakes too)
Oregon 3-6, 1-5 Pac12
Oregon St. 2-7, 1-5 Pac12
Utah 7-2, 4-2 Pac12 (this team played a bunch of cupcakes too)
California 4-5, 2-4 Pac12
God damnit. You're (at least) the second one to say they're a top 10 team today. My ass Penn state is a top 10 team.Yup. They're a top 10 team and it was on the road. It's one we should've won, but we're still clearly better than Washington.
Speculation is not fact. They are undefeated. Learn to deal with your AD and downward spiral....There may be several teams that would go undefeated with that schedule. And the PAC hasn't been performing at a high level
Clown responce is funnyFinally....speechless !
You already tried to break down the pac. You did a terrible job... no one cares to see you struggle through it again.Why don't you try to contribute to the topic? Rather than giving a weak response.If you would like I can break down the PAC for you. And compare it to the other conferences. To give you a good look at the potential playoff picture. As well as how SOS may play a major role this season.
Clown responce is funny
USC, UTAH and the winner of the PAC 12 South will be good teams. I don't know who you classify as a quality team? What quality team has Bama beaten, or want quality team has the Buckeyes beaten?That is probably what will happen. Then they will get embarrassed in the first playoff game.
Edit: And at the end of the season they will not have beaten a quality team.
Clown responce is funny
I've got an on topic response about your thread...Listen little shit, either post something related to this thread's topic or get the fuck off my thread !
Turd, little shit? Look, jr. you are making yourself look like a total asshat. You clearly don't follow college football and like making an ass of LSU fans. I have contributed to your pathetic attempt at whining about the Huskies thread and you still look like a retard chasing skittles. Stop now, many posters have clowned your position. Move on with you tail between your legs before you look even worse.Listen little shit, either post something related to this thread's topic or get the fuck off my thread !
I'm not worried about SC or Swann. Nor does that change the facts. That Washington does have a weak schedule. Or that it is a down year in the PAC. I may not agree with the SEC scheduling. However it holds a lot more weight when your divisional rivals are ranked.Speculation is not fact. They are undefeated. Learn to deal with your AD and downward spiral....
I've got an on topic response about your thread...
It sucks.
Who should be #4 this week?I'm not worried about SC or Swann. Nor does that change the facts. That Washington does have a weak schedule. Or that it is a down year in the PAC. I may not agree with the SEC scheduling. However it holds a lot more weight when your divisional rivals are ranked.
You might say it's inconvenient...The truth often does !
This goes back yo wanting to play your rivals at their best. While you may take joy in an Oregon loss.That and the PAC underperforming .Hurts Washington's or any other PAC teams SOS in the big picture.You already tried to break down the pac. You did a terrible job... no one cares to see you struggle through it again.
At this moment Ohio State. But thats not relevant until the end of the regular season and CCG's.Who should be #4 this week?