- Thread starter
- #1
@49ersPR Alex Smith sets franchise record for consecutive pass attempts w/o INT - 185. Steve Young had 184
and still counting. Just unbelievable to me.
Good for him! I think he is going to get better because his options have improved. When your 4th option on a pass play is Mario Manningham, you have a pretty decent group of receivers.
Just asking... Does incomplete passes count or just completed passes?
Both count
Thanks... So I could throw out of bounds 300 times and have the record lol
Thanks... So I could throw out of bounds 300 times and have the record lol
Haha! 359 times. but yep, you certainly could.
The chart on this NFC West Blog entry is pretty cool for reference to all QBs.
Interception rates since 49ers' streak began - NFC West Blog - ESPN
Probably would have to string it through 4 or five teams into the arena league 'cuz no way would you keep your gig in one place.
The chart on this NFC West Blog entry is pretty cool for reference to all QBs.
Interception rates since 49ers' streak began - NFC West Blog - ESPN
Effing ESPN or as someone once called them BS-PeeN - These jerkwads must be the most incompetent statisticians to ever grace the globe!
First off you NEVER use dropbacks as the denominator to measure an INT ratio. So, to correct the tards over at WTF, Smith had zero INT's over 173 pass attempts since the beginning of the StL game during week 13.
Second, since WTF is counting "Dropped INT's" on one side of the equation they have to count them on the other side as well in order to create a +/- net result. As an example, although it shows up on Smith's stat line, I don't think too many people are blaming Smith for Ginn's INT vs. the NYG's.
Third, weighting "INT's" & "Almost INT's" the same then combining them into a numerator is just dumb on so many levels. Doing so removes a contrasting statistic as well as other statistical derivations.
Fourth, Shouldn't the title of the article be: "Interception & Almost Interception Rates Since The 49ers' Streak Began"
Finally, Smith had more then two "Almost INT's" last year as well as a 6th INT to Webster (NYG) that was nullified by an off-side penalty.
Effing tards over at WTF at it again
[/Rant]
Oh, the content of the chart was heavily flawed, but I thought the aesthetics of the chart looked pretty cool. Just kidding.
I would say the information is not so much flawed as it is meaningless - much like their QBR BS.
As for the "chart" aesthetics, first, it is a table not a chart; second, even that needs improvement, columns 1 & 3-6 should have centered.
extended it to 216 tonight.