john01992
New Member
Dear ACC,
You're Welcome
signed,
Syracuse & Pitt
You're Welcome
signed,
Syracuse & Pitt
for the record I asked Jonvi that question and couldn't care less about what you have to say. You know nothing about basketball so I will disregard your statement, and every other statement you ever make.
Dear ACC,
You're Welcome
signed,
Syracuse & Pitt
Dear ACC,
You're Welcome
signed,
Syracuse & Pitt
syracuse guys, I am not one to (too often) play the comparison game...BUT USC beat that BC by 16 points...at home, for sure, but....yikes i expected a lot more from you guys.
Alas, a W is a W, amiright jonvi. Still got a couple of 17-0 teams on our hands, and that ain't bad
SU beat Nova by 16. I don't think one game has anything to do with another.
The last three games, SU's been without Coleman...lame knee. SU adjusting to a different rotation has them slow on the offensive end. But the D is still clamping down and luckily SU has a nice schedule to keep them working towards that one seed.
for what?
no offense, but Coleman has a lame game, whether healthy or not. Guy just isn't very good. Maybe he will by next year, but if you are hoping he will be a major contributor, i just don't see it. Another big body, yes, but that's about it.
pitt has played 0 ranked teams. but of course, since the computers like them, slapdick is all in on them!
syracuse guys, I am not one to (too often) play the comparison game...BUT USC beat that BC by 16 points...at home, for sure, but....yikes i expected a lot more from you guys.
Alas, a W is a W, amiright jonvi. Still got a couple of 17-0 teams on our hands, and that ain't bad
no offense, but Coleman has a lame game, whether healthy or not. Guy just isn't very good. Maybe he will by next year, but if you are hoping he will be a major contributor, i just don't see it. Another big body, yes, but that's about it.
no offense, but Coleman has a lame game, whether healthy or not. Guy just isn't very good. Maybe he will by next year, but if you are hoping he will be a major contributor, i just don't see it. Another big body, yes, but that's about it.
he's still young, big and dumb. But he's a huge body that is athletic enough to be a disruption. He isn't much on offense, but he does a lot on the defensive side altering shots, getting boards. And his 5 fouls...they know they been hacked. Add his five fouls in with Christmas and Keita.....Coleman is another piece of the whole.
a big body is nice to have. syracuse seems to have a bad track record with big men lately, and at this point I have kinda given up hope on him. he is a local and a lotta fans like him for that ==> but man he is testing my patience
ok now we are just entering the house of stupidity here.......
pitt has played 0 ranked teams. but of course, since the computers like them, slapdick is all in on them!
Have you actually seen them play? You don't beat teams by double digits the entire year, sans 1 game, and not be a good team.
yes I have seen them play. and you do beat teams by double digits when you play really shitty teams. It's the same with every Pitt team EVERY year, they play nobody in the nonconference. If they go 14-4 in the ACC, i will change my tune (slightly), but if you think that team can do damage in the tourney, well I disagree.
also, i don't think they will go 14-4 in the ACC, 11-7 is more likely and that wouldn't be all that great
The same Pitt teams were consistently winning 10-14 games in the Big East every year, and winning Big East titles as much as anyone the past 10 years, after their cupcake OOC schedules. If you wanna talk tourney failures I'm with you, but to suggest Pitt isn't a good regular season team is just beyond stupid.
The ACC is really down this year, I wouldn't be at all surprised with 14 wins, although losing Durand Johnson for the season hurts.