- Thread starter
- #1
Crimsoncrew
Well-Known Member
- 10,323
- 56
- 48
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
I re-watched the entire super bowl over a period of several days (work has been insane lately), keeping an eye particularly on the officiating. I was keeping track based on the timing of the YouTube full-game clip (NFL Super Bowl XLVII Baltimore Ravens vs San Francisco 49's [Full Game] - YouTube), and I'll post that review below. But I also had an overall officiating epiphany of sorts that I wanted to begin with.
First, as I've said many times, the Niners played poorly and it started on the first play of the game. That illegal formation penalty was a big one, and it didn't get much better from there. If they had come out ready to play, they win this game easily. They also had a great opportunity to win at the end, but blew it with bad play calls. How they didn't give Gore at least one run in the final goal line drive is beyond me. He was averaging nearly 20 YPC in the 4th quarter.
Considering that final goal-line stand, were there potential penalties? Absolutely. I didn't originally think Crabtree was interfered with on second down, but re-watching it - and this was clearer on Sound FX than the game tape - there's little doubt the contact was early. On third down there was a brutal helmet-to-helmet hit. And we all know about 4th down. But none of those was so blatant that you would expect to see it called at that point in a super bowl. My major complaints with the officiating arise earlier.
What bothers me the most about the officiating - other than the simply egregious decision not to eject Cary Williams and not to call holds on the safety, even though they would have been irrelevant - is that a single call and a single no-call completely shifted the game in Baltimore's favor in the second half.
IMO, Baltimore had only four big "offensive plays," loosely defined, in the second half. More or less in order of significance, I would rank them as: 1) the KO return, 2) the third-and-one pass to Boldin on the Ravens' final scoring drive, 3) the third-and-nine PI call against Culliver in that same drive, and 4) the 30-yard catch-and-run by Boldin in the Ravens' only other scoring drive in the half. The first of those was made possible by the blatant holds on Bruce Miller. The second and third were made possible by the PI call against Culliver - the second in that the PI call extended the drive. We keep hearing that officials don't want to be the difference in the game, but by allowing the TD return and calling the PI, they did just that.
Mike Pereira can talk all he wants about two players not bringing a guy to the ground, but that rule specifically applies to close line play. The holds here were absolutely blatant, and Miller was the guy whose gap was blown.
As for the PI against Culliver, I watched that play a lot to see what happened. There was illegal contact, but both teams had been committing illegal contact all game and it was never called. In this case, although Culliver put his hand on Smith, it's not at all clear that he impeded him. Smith pushes off, and Culliver grabs him a bit. Then Smith basically posts up on Culliver. There is plenty of contact here, but it's mutual. Smith doesn't really even make a play for the ball until it's by him. In a normal game, I wouldn't be surprised that this was called, though I think illegal contact is the better call here. Given the way this game was being called, I find it outrageous that this was the single PI that was called. A very significant play, and no flags were thrown earlier in the game when obvious early contact prevented Culliver himself and Crabtree from catching balls that hit their hands.
Anyway, trying to move on after posting this. Doubt it will work...
First, as I've said many times, the Niners played poorly and it started on the first play of the game. That illegal formation penalty was a big one, and it didn't get much better from there. If they had come out ready to play, they win this game easily. They also had a great opportunity to win at the end, but blew it with bad play calls. How they didn't give Gore at least one run in the final goal line drive is beyond me. He was averaging nearly 20 YPC in the 4th quarter.
Considering that final goal-line stand, were there potential penalties? Absolutely. I didn't originally think Crabtree was interfered with on second down, but re-watching it - and this was clearer on Sound FX than the game tape - there's little doubt the contact was early. On third down there was a brutal helmet-to-helmet hit. And we all know about 4th down. But none of those was so blatant that you would expect to see it called at that point in a super bowl. My major complaints with the officiating arise earlier.
What bothers me the most about the officiating - other than the simply egregious decision not to eject Cary Williams and not to call holds on the safety, even though they would have been irrelevant - is that a single call and a single no-call completely shifted the game in Baltimore's favor in the second half.
IMO, Baltimore had only four big "offensive plays," loosely defined, in the second half. More or less in order of significance, I would rank them as: 1) the KO return, 2) the third-and-one pass to Boldin on the Ravens' final scoring drive, 3) the third-and-nine PI call against Culliver in that same drive, and 4) the 30-yard catch-and-run by Boldin in the Ravens' only other scoring drive in the half. The first of those was made possible by the blatant holds on Bruce Miller. The second and third were made possible by the PI call against Culliver - the second in that the PI call extended the drive. We keep hearing that officials don't want to be the difference in the game, but by allowing the TD return and calling the PI, they did just that.
Mike Pereira can talk all he wants about two players not bringing a guy to the ground, but that rule specifically applies to close line play. The holds here were absolutely blatant, and Miller was the guy whose gap was blown.
As for the PI against Culliver, I watched that play a lot to see what happened. There was illegal contact, but both teams had been committing illegal contact all game and it was never called. In this case, although Culliver put his hand on Smith, it's not at all clear that he impeded him. Smith pushes off, and Culliver grabs him a bit. Then Smith basically posts up on Culliver. There is plenty of contact here, but it's mutual. Smith doesn't really even make a play for the ball until it's by him. In a normal game, I wouldn't be surprised that this was called, though I think illegal contact is the better call here. Given the way this game was being called, I find it outrageous that this was the single PI that was called. A very significant play, and no flags were thrown earlier in the game when obvious early contact prevented Culliver himself and Crabtree from catching balls that hit their hands.
Anyway, trying to move on after posting this. Doubt it will work...