- Thread starter
- #1
MCDevils
NJ Devils: Sweden West
Introduction:
===========================================
Basic Stats for Zajac:
Section 1: The Defensive Game
TOI Allocation:
Quality of Competition:
===========================================
Section 2: The Linemates.
===========================================
Section 3: Faceoffs and Zone Starts
Faceoffs:
ZONE STARTS:
Travis is an intriguing choice because there are so many aspects of his game that don’t appear on basic score sheets, making in-depth analysis of his game pretty important.
Let’s start with the basics. Zajac had a pretty rough year this season, failing to adjust to new line-mates, and was unable to build upon two excellent seasons prior. His point totals, +/-, PROD, and most of his other stats took a hit. At the same time, some stats stayed the same or improved; examples include FO%, ATOI, and takeaways.
In this post, you’re going to get quite a lot of metric based information, which I’m going to try my best to express in the fewest numbers possible. Lots of calculations and research went into these, and I hope you find it interesting. This is going to be a long one, but I think you’ll find the results thought-provoking.
NOTE: Almost no players had “statistically good” years (God smiled on you Elias). We obviously took half a season to start playing winning hockey, and a lot of stats look god awful. Because of this, it’s very important to look at past performance for players such as Zajac, Parise, Kovalchuk, Elias, etc, etc.
Let’s start with the basics. Zajac had a pretty rough year this season, failing to adjust to new line-mates, and was unable to build upon two excellent seasons prior. His point totals, +/-, PROD, and most of his other stats took a hit. At the same time, some stats stayed the same or improved; examples include FO%, ATOI, and takeaways.
In this post, you’re going to get quite a lot of metric based information, which I’m going to try my best to express in the fewest numbers possible. Lots of calculations and research went into these, and I hope you find it interesting. This is going to be a long one, but I think you’ll find the results thought-provoking.
NOTE: Almost no players had “statistically good” years (God smiled on you Elias). We obviously took half a season to start playing winning hockey, and a lot of stats look god awful. Because of this, it’s very important to look at past performance for players such as Zajac, Parise, Kovalchuk, Elias, etc, etc.
===========================================
Basic Stats for Zajac:
Section 1: The Defensive Game
TOI Allocation:
Penalty Kill TOI
One of the biggest reasons Zajac is allowed to eat so many minutes is his relatively stellar defensive play. Along with Parise and Elias, Zajac has essentially eliminated the need for dedicated “defensive players” and single faceted PK specialists such as Madden and Pandolfo. This season, Zajac was used more heavily than ever in all situations, including time on the PK.
From 09/10 to 10/11, Zajac saw his average time on the PK/g increase by nearly 20 seconds per game. That’s a substantial increase. He was also basically tied with Elias for the team lead in PK time amongst forwards. Zajac was used to kill penalties more than ever, a situation that arose with Parise’s absence.
From 09/10 to 10/11, Zajac saw his average time on the PK/g increase by nearly 20 seconds per game. That’s a substantial increase. He was also basically tied with Elias for the team lead in PK time amongst forwards. Zajac was used to kill penalties more than ever, a situation that arose with Parise’s absence.
Takeaways
Zajac led the team with a mammoth 60 takeaways and a team best takeaway/giveaway differential. 60 to 34. His takeaways were 33% higher than Elias (2nd best) at 45.
Quality of Competition:
QUALCOMP
Zajac, as one of the team’s best defensive forwards, would be expected to faceoff against the other team’s toughest players. Shockingly, he’s 5th on the team in QualCOMP this season trailing Elias, Rolston, Zubrus, and even Kovalchuk by a very small amount.
- The most interesting part of Qualcomp actually has to do with the Devils defensive strategy. Zajac and Parise obviously were the major components to both the offense and defense of this team, BUT with Parise out, Zajac was paired with Kovalchuk. Obviously, Kovalchuk isn’t the best defensively, so the Devils shifted Zajac out of the role he was normally filling, and had Elias’s line against the opponents top line.
- This might be something the Devils want to continue in the future (matching Elias/Zubrus against the top opponents). There’s really two options here.
- Match power against power (Zajac-Parise) against the top line for the opponents.
- Or Zajac-Parise need to play against what is likely the other team’s shutdown line. Personally, I feel this is the least desired option, because Zajac-Parise proved they can dominate games against opponents’ top lines.
- Or Zajac-Parise need to play against what is likely the other team’s shutdown line. Personally, I feel this is the least desired option, because Zajac-Parise proved they can dominate games against opponents’ top lines.
===========================================
Section 2: The Linemates.
This will be one of the shortest sections here because all the metrics indicate that Zajac is dominant when playing with Parise, and below average when playing with Kovalchuk. This isn’t a criticism on Kovalchuk, but Zajac obviously needs to focus more on back checking while paired with Kovy, and I think we can all agree their styles don’t mesh well.
- Notable decrease in Corsi+ while playing with Kovalchuk vs Parise.
- Zajac put up better numbers while playing against tougher opponents when playing with ZZPops. It’s critical to put him back into a situation where he can succeed.
- Zajac put up better numbers while playing against tougher opponents when playing with ZZPops. It’s critical to put him back into a situation where he can succeed.
===========================================
Section 3: Faceoffs and Zone Starts
Faceoffs:
Zajac took a big step forward this season with his faceoff percentage, setting new career highs. He was essentially a Top 15 centerman in the league this year in that regard. Furthremore, most of the centers ahead of him are role players who specialize in faceoffs. Zajac is obviously relied upon to provide substantially more than that.
- Zajac had a 55.3% winning percentage this season overall, but did struggle in some areas.
Defensive Zone faceoffs:
- Zajac was below 50% on these critical opportunities (could use some improvement)
- He was over 50% in the defensive and neutral zone on the Penalty Kill so he’s good in clutch shorthanded situations.
- He was over 50% in the defensive and neutral zone on the Penalty Kill so he’s good in clutch shorthanded situations.
Powerplay FO%:
- One of the most important FO stats is his Powerplay FO%. He’s an absolute animal, winning over 66% of his opportunities on the Powerplay.
Zajac’s UFO:
- Ultimate Faceoff Percentage adjusts FO% to include the quality of the opponent the player is facing. Of the top 20 faceoff men in the league, Zajac was tied for the second hardest opponents, making his 56% overall very impressive.
ZONE STARTS:
I was predicting an even distribution for Zajac because he plays well in all three zones, but I was surprised to learn that he’s starting in the offensive zone 56% of the time. That’s the highest on the team, which seems logical now, considering he was on the #1 line.
- Travis also had one of the highest Offensive Zone Finish rates on the team, meaning he and Kovalchuk are generating offensive chances. This needs to continue.
Last edited by a moderator: