79 - 99 Bucket NFL Draft : CHAT

[Nosferatu]

One per team Max or no?

Umm, let me think about that one for a min, what do you think? I like it but we are really setting alot of obstacals in the way...

 

[UK Cowboy]

Umm, let me think about that one for a min, what do you think? I like it but we are really setting alot of obstacals in the way...

Bucket is bucket, no team restrictions

 

[Shanemansj13]

One per team Max or no?

2 Max?

 

[Shanemansj13]

Why have buckets if you can pick from all the same team? I think having to pick from at least 2 teams from each bucket is fair...

 

[Nosferatu]

Why have buckets if you can pick from all the same team? I think having to pick from at least 2 teams from each bucket is fair...

Well, each bucket has 4 teams and you pick 3 from each bucket

 

[Shanemansj13]

Well, each bucket has 4 teams and you pick 3 from each bucket

Yeah but if we have no restrictions than you can pick all those players from the same team. I'm fine with whatever.

 

[Shanemansj13]

So a player could have played his last season in 1979? Correct?

 

[femurov]

Do they have to start from 79 to 99 or just play in those years?

 

[Nosferatu]

Do they have to start from 79 to 99 or just play in those years?

Well if we do they just had to play in those years we might as well just have an open draft no?

 

[UK Cowboy]

Well if we do they just had to play in those years we might as well just have an open draft no?

Rookie 79 through Rookie 99

 

[Shanemansj13]

Well if we do they just had to play in those years we might as well just have an open draft no?

idk I am making a list now and it isn't a huge pool plus restricting 4 players per bucket makes the pool smaller especially the deeper you go

 

[femurov]

Well if we do they just had to play in those years we might as well just have an open draft no?

Not really. You open it up a little more, but not near as much as an open draft.

 

[Shanemansj13]

Rookie 79 through Rookie 99

79 rookie through 99 rookie isn't a very large pool IMO

 

[UK Cowboy]

idk I am making a list now and it isn't a huge pool plus restricting 4 players per bucket makes the pool smaller especially the deeper you go

I disagree, it's a fantastic pool....every position

 

[Nosferatu]

Question, instead of having 21 years should we do 25 and have it be 1975 - 1999?

 

[UK Cowboy]

Question, instead of having 21 years should we do 25 and have it be 1975 - 1999?

Man, I will tell you...with Easy having surgery tomorrow, I researched 79-99 today so I'd have a list...everyone will have multiple time pro bowlers at every spot and several HOFers from that period

 

[femurov]

79 rookie through 99 rookie isn't a very large pool IMO

Not big enough to have to set a cap on it, imo.

 

[femurov]

The more I think about it, the more I think it is a little overkill to have the year restrictions plus the cap plus the bucket, which is supposed to be the main point of this draft. Unless the cap is VERY small, aimed at having to select a solid amount of $1-$3 range guys, I would say scrap one or the other. Or increase the range.

But this is all just my opinion and I will do whatever the group feels is best.

Also, we should hash out the starting requirements now. It seems like the last few football drafts we have started to argue how many players and at what positions (mostly how many "subs" for different packages) well into the first few rounds, then talk about how we need to do it differently for the next draft. Well, we are at the next draft, so let's do it differently!

 

[Shanemansj13]

Man, I will tell you...with Easy having surgery tomorrow, I researched 79-99 today so I'd have a list...everyone will have multiple time pro bowlers at every spot and several HOFers from that period

Not if it is ROOKIE YEAR 1979

 

[Shanemansj13]

The more I think about it, the more I think it is a little overkill to have the year restrictions plus the cap plus the bucket, which is supposed to be the main point of this draft. Unless the cap is VERY small, aimed at having to select a solid amount of $1-$3 range guys, I would say scrap one or the other. Or increase the range.

But this is all just my opinion and I will do whatever the group feels is best.

Also, we should hash out the starting requirements now. It seems like the last few football drafts we have started to argue how many players and at what positions (mostly how many "subs" for different packages) well into the first few rounds, then talk about how we need to do it differently for the next draft. Well, we are at the next draft, so let's do it differently!

These will be all starters so there shouldn't be any arguing, unless you mean make it 3 WR's since we are required to have 3 CB's...