Stakesarehigh
One day it will all make sense
Bridges fits on every team
Every single one
Small guards need a lot of help and protection defensively
I'm not saying Bridges isn't worth more
That is a massive delta
Bridges fits on every team
Every single one
Small guards need a lot of help and protection defensively
I'm not saying Bridges isn't worth more
That is a massive delta
Imaginary
Brown is a lot better than Garland.
Probably 3-4 picks and matching salary.
Brown is a 2 way player.
Garland is a 1 way player who is inconsistent offensively. That is not worth $40 million.
The Pistons will gladly trade their 5th pick for Garland lol. Flip Ivey then
This mostly came up with my pistons friend after seeing browns playoff analytics, the Celtics salary cap and the pistons needing a vet more than another project
It would mostly be a way to keep white, duck under the how dare you actually try apron, get a pick that could get traded for a dude like bridges, and maybe land younger help like ivey and grimes
Lots of options
Fun exercise
Not even sure Brad has the stones to trade brown (who might be the most overrated player in the nba now that Wiggins fluke 4 months are over)
And he’s got boulders
To make the salaries work....it would be Keldon Johnson and Zach Collins plus the #4 pick.
That is too much for Garland who is coming off a season where he averaged 18ppg and 6.5apg. plus, he is injury prone.
How about this:
When we see who goes 1-3 you will be able to select any remaining player in this draft for the SA Spurs and then we will compare this player to Garland over the next 3-4 years. We will also keep in mind that the Spurs are likely to be a team that is working hard to get to the cap floor because of their rebuild.
You're going to have to throw in a couple draft picks with that to make it workI'd contemplate murdering Brad Steven's first born child for Jaylen Brown.
That took a dark turn
No it isn’t at allTo make the salaries work....it would be Keldon Johnson and Zach Collins plus the #4 pick.
That is too much for Garland who is coming off a season where he averaged 18ppg and 6.5apg. plus, he is injury prone.
Cmon man.
Cleveland comes to SA with that deal?
They say no.
Reverse?
Cleveland says yes.
Not going to happen.
I think Cleveland could do better than the deal aboveTo make the salaries work....it would be Keldon Johnson and Zach Collins plus the #4 pick.
That is too much for Garland who is coming off a season where he averaged 18ppg and 6.5apg. plus, he is injury prone.
8 years. Well if the player sucks, they won’t. Garland is already an established player. He is an All-Star. You are only looking at it from one side.No deal.
I am not saying that player is going to be better.
I am saying that player is cheaper and under team control for the next 8 years.
That matters.
Especially when we are talking about a player like Garland who is nothing special.
Of course they aren’t. Gotta make salaries work. The Cavs aren’t trading Garland for an unknown draft pick/player. That would be stupid. They want a young player with talent and picks. If it was a deal it would be picks (plural) Keldon and salary filler.And the Spurs aren’t trading their 4th overall pick for Garland.
So why are we talking about this?
You love pointing out 2 years ago with Garland....well guess what?8 years. Well if the player sucks, they won’t. Garland is already an established player. He is an All-Star. You are only looking at it from one side.
You trade picks in bad drafts for established players. The problem is that is difficult bc nobody wants these picks. A pick outside of the top 5 is garbage value in this draft. A top 5 pick is much better but still not a ton of value. The Cavs can get Ingram straight up if they wanted to. I think they can get Keldon and 2 1st’s. Keldon at this point is a role player. Garland is far from that.
Just stop dude.You love pointing out 2 years ago with Garland....well guess what?
Johnson averaged 22ppg and 5rpg 2 seasons ago with the Spurs....he lost some touches and shots with shots with Wemby.
He was a #2 on a playoff team. Anything else?If Johnson is a role player....so is Garland. He isn't a #1 or a #2 on a really good good team. I don't even think he is a #3, probably a #4 option on offense on a title contending team.
A playoff team. I said a title contender.He was a #2 on a playoff team. Anything else?
So now you are essentially saying Keldon is better than Garland hahahaha
This is going to look pretty funny soon if the Cavs trade him. They can get Ingram straight up most likely. Even though you said before Ingram was a far superior player.
You have no idea