- 178,628
- 57,946
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Location
- Still stuck here in Nash-Vegas
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,842,405.64
It really isn't.
It really isn't.
No I meant the chatter when they got Durant, a lot of people were like "bad move for Golden State you give up too much depth". That was funny.Even then, 2016 only happened because Barnes shot lower than his age from 3 on 85 wide open attempts
No I meant the chatter when they got Durant, a lot of people were like "bad move for Golden State you give up too much depth". That was funny.
Golden State feels the same way. It's Phoenix that's probably the most eager suitor, followed by Miami.My thoughts exactly
It's gotta be Siakam or Barnes. If they can't get Barnes, I'm sure Siakam is still a somewhat attractive piece but his contract is the difference. Barnes is the much more valuable piece. They are more of a contender if they keep Siakam now and adding KD but the future is brighter keeping Barnes. Tough decisions giving up a young player for a 34 year old that is somewhat injury prone.
Trent/OG/Precious + picks works cap-wise, but doesn't seem enough for the Nets? Maybe include Koloko?Thats way too much
3 players who averaged over 18 a gane last year plus picks
Masai hangs up the phone
![]()
Trail Blazers Waive Eric Bledsoe
Portland have parted ways with Bledsoe before his full $19MM+ salary for 2022/23 became guaranteed.www.hoopsrumors.com
Trade dame if you aren’t willing to go into the tax for him
Definitely need to add a beefier c to that group since embiid is still in the East
My deal above is more than fair
they're throwing out Ingram trades and I'm pretty sure he would also violate that stupid rule, just like Bam and Porter Jr do.
That' might be PHX's biggest advantage with Bridges and picks is that he doesn't violate that silly rule.
Shit, I would be greedy too. KD might be 34 but we have never seen a player ask out to this caliberAn appropriate mix makes perfect sense. Wanting 60 percent of a 4 seed playoff teams roster AND picks is just plain greedy.
So you have Siakam, KD and FVV. That isn't better than a couple big 3's already out there.If they are giving up a ton of assets for 34 year old
Durant, it is a pretty easy call IMO.
You trade Barnes.
Siakim’s window lines up better with Durant and Barnes is a lot more valuable in trade.
That isn't a good package. BKN hangs up the phoneTrent/OG/Precious + picks works cap-wise, but doesn't seem enough for the Nets? Maybe include Koloko?
So you have Siakam, KD and FVV. That isn't better than a couple big 3's already out there.
Sorry I'm not doing it if Barnes is included with Trent and OG.
That isn't a good package. BKN hangs up the phone
Not a fan of depth either. Depth matters. Boston is better and they improved their depth. Miami is right there too. Like I said, it makes them a top 4 team in the east but one injury and that team is having problems. If I was TOR I would not trade for him and yes, I would rarely say that about a team.They still have solid depth beyond the guys going out.
And I disagree on the big 3’s.
Only 1 that is even comparable is Milwaukee. And then LA if they land Kyrie.