Not at all....point was winning those titles with people who are not even there to help AND when game/CBA was totally different is valid.Far less absurd than trying to use an NFL comp.
Not at all....point was winning those titles with people who are not even there to help AND when game/CBA was totally different is valid.
Yep, his game is hard to see clearly for how good it is, because it's contingent on who's around him. He's the ultimate complimentary player, not at all an "alpha". But he's every bit as important to the title teams as Steph and Klay.Like I have said many times Dray is a very good player with grest players or a good supporting cast of players..when he doesn’t, it looks like he isn’t on the court. But it’s pretty dramatic the difference.
Not at all....point was winning those titles with people who are not even there to help AND when game/CBA was totally different is valid.
Young players grow dream of wearing a Laker uniform because of Kobe and now LeBron and the glitz and glamour that come with it.
So they are always going to more able to land a free agent star when they have a quality core.
The last rebuild took a long time because the organization was run poorly.
BUT their market creates such a huge built in advantage that it would take a real fool to think they won’t get back to the top again in the future.
They do, eh? too bad none of those young guys grew up and chose to play with Lebron when there was a max deal available, huh?Young players grow dream of wearing a Laker uniform because of Kobe and now LeBron and the glitz and glamour that come with it.
So they are always going to more able to land a free agent star when they have a quality core.
The last rebuild took a long time because the organization was run poorly.
BUT their market creates such a huge built in advantage that it would take a real fool to think they won’t get back to the top again in the future.
Ok....but that kind of helps make my point. Lakers winning titles when there was no cap or some with no FA does not mean they can win them quickly now....never mind no one around to help from even their most recent successful era.Actually, because of the difference in cap rules, it isn't very valid at all.
The NFL basically has a hard cap...that's why when a QB "gets his bag", teams have to start making salary cuts in other areas. In the NBA, a team can pay a superstar player and still add at least 1 or 2 more because of all of the different ways there are to go over the cap.
Because the NBA has more ways to work around the cap, NBA FA's have more choices and, like it or not, most are going to choose "destination cities". The advantage isn't as big as it used to be...but it's still there and we see it play out in some fashion most off seasons.
agreed.....even with Lebron was this "competent FO" able to lure another elite FA with max cap room available?^^^This^^^
Especially the bold.
The Lakers missed out on star FA's after Kobe retired because Short Buss was incompetent and thought all he had to do was say "We're the Lakers, here's the contract, here's a pen" and they'd just sign on the dotted line.
But a team like the Lakers with at least a competent FO is going to have an advantage over a non-destination city with a competent FO.
Did anyone consider how poor of a GM Lebron is?Can only Lebron and AD for this. Wasn't there reports of them meeting with Russ prior to the deal being made? Did they ever consider how poor of a fit he would be?
Ok....but that kind of helps make my point. Lakers winning titles when there was no cap or some with no FA does not mean they can win them quickly now....never mind no one around to help from even their most recent successful era.
agreed.....even with Lebron was this "competent FO" able to lure another elite FA with max cap room available?
Well 5 straight post season appearance, then you lose Durant, Klay and then Steph gets injured. Team was forced to start Ky Bowman at PG who’s not even in the league anymore.That's kind of embarrassing that the first time you are on a shit team you mail it in
Yep, his game is hard to see clearly for how good it is, because it's contingent on who's around him. He's the ultimate complimentary player, not at all an "alpha". But he's every bit as important to the title teams as Steph and Klay.
He's orders of magnitude more than Fisher. Fisher was never in danger of winning DPOY, nor could he distribute (or rebound) like Draymond.He is like a bigger, louder Derek Fisher. He is the guy who does the things that have to be done to win that dont always show up on the stat sheet. He is also the guy who can say the things that need to be said to teammates, including the stars, that no one else can or will.
He's orders of magnitude more than Fisher. Fisher was never in danger of winning DPOY, nor could he distribute (or rebound) like Draymond.
But agreed that they are similar in terms of leadership.