- Thread starter
- #2,781
bksballer89
Most Popular Member
Give me Jimmy Butler any day of the week over Paul George.
Can you not read?
Pats won the superbowl in February 2005 and did not win another superbowl until February 2015.....
You said they have a better record with Lonzo starting. How is that not implying their wins aren't related to Lonzo starting? YOU are trying to move the goal posts my friend.You're kidding with this, right?
They're 2-1 with Lonzo starting and 0-3 with Rondo starting. Where did I say it was because of Lonzo?
You said Lonzo's starting wasn't equating to wins. I pointed out that their 2 wins were with Lonzo starting and they're 0-3 with Rondo starting.
Now you want to move the goalposts and claim something I never said.
Wiggy hack your account?
you don't think this is the first time the rules have been changed in favor of the offense, do you...?
Trolling your ass and you can't even tell.....this is fun
There is no suddenly lol. I made comments about Lonzo's game & where improvements are needed-specifically based on the style of play- and you felt the need to debate that as if he's a finished product. I pointed out Rondo is the better player & then YOU brought up the fact that they have a better record with Lonzo starting. I think it's clear why they're winning- which was my point.Then why bring it up in the first place?
You threw it out there like you had some great point.
You were shown to be wrong.
Now suddenly, we're only 6 or 7 games in.
Um, no, why do you ask?
He's got more rings than Dwight too. lol
You said they have a better record with Lonzo starting. How is that not implying their wins aren't related to Lonzo starting? YOU are trying to move the goal posts my friend.
simply pointing out a trend that's been happening for a pretty decent while...
generally speaking, the thought is more points make for more excitement. too bad, really. I used to like good defense...
No it's not the end of story because the point is they're winning because of LBJ NOT Lonzo. Goodness.I said it because it's true.
It's real simple.
You said Lonzo starting wasn't equating to wins.
I pointed out they're only 2 wins were with Lonzo starting.
You made a statement.
Your statement was wrong.
I pointed it out.
End of story.
There is no suddenly lol. I made comments about Lonzo's game & where improvements are needed-specifically based on the style of play- and you felt the need to debate that as if he's a finished product. I pointed out Rondo is the better player & then YOU brought up the fact that they have a better record with Lonzo starting. I think it's clear why they're winning- which was my point.
Hurts my online pride.
simply pointing out a trend that's been happening for a pretty decent while...
generally speaking, the thought is more points make for more excitement. too bad, really. I used to like good defense...
Welp...looks like Lonzo's record just took a hit. Lol
Well that certainly is subjective & definitely your opinion.And your statement re: his style of play was wrong. It was proven wrong.
End of story.