osubuckeye89
Well-Known Member
Thanks Shapiro.
He did some good things, and I know he's well regarded, but when they announced he was headed to Toronto, I was not heartbroken. I was a little concerned that his team was staying in place in Cleveland and just getting promotions, but I gotta say, I'm TOTALLY fine with that now.
What do you have to say about that, Danny? @Bloody Brian Burke
Shapiro did weasle some decent players for mediocre/aging players. I'll give him that
Ben Broussard for Shin-Soo Choo
Einar Diaz and Ryan Drese for Travis Hafner
Eduardo Perez for Asdrubal Cabrera
Casey Blake for Carlos Santana
Drafting was pretty bad to say the least though
Mark Shapiro's Drafts: An "Objective" Analysis
Not So Hot In Cleveland: So where did Cleveland end up in this ranking? 9th of 11th. Slightly behind the Marlins and barely ahead of Seattle (KC was last). Shaprio's drafts produced only 8.79% of players to make The Show, had a respectable WAR drafted of 93.4, but only 23 players with meaningful service time. Finally, Cleveland drafted six award worthy seasons. On average, 10.2% percent of players drafted played in a major league game, and of the 500 players typically drafted, 27 would give you a good run of games played in.
Tim Lincecum and the Flaw in the Method: However, there is a statistical outlier that needs to be addressed. Included in Cleveland's draft is Tim Lincecum, who accounts for all the award seasons and a good chunk of WAR. As he didn't sign and re-entered the next year, if you disregard his contribution, Cleveland's slightly bad drafts become a whole lot worse. They would be the only team with exactly zero Awards seasons drafted. Not one All-Star, no Gold Gloves. Nada. Zero. Zip. Their WAR would drop by 23.9 putting them at 69.9 (in front of only Seattle at 68.2 and Miami at 59.5). As a result, their final standing would put them in dead last.