tryin' to turn me into a gambler or what...?![]()
ahh...
so you ARE tryin' to turn me into a gambler...![]()
I just want your Hoop cash.....50-60.
I can set it up.
Nah he was probably slightly better than Heild but not Blake. Griffin was a stud. It didn't help that Beasley played for Kansas St. though.
* makes @ChiefsLakers67 an appointment @ the cyber-foodbank*sure...
i have so much...
Player A shooting % .618, 3 pt .300, FT .589 ,Rebounds 11.8, assists 2.1, steals 1.1, blocks 1.1 , PPG 18.8
Player B shooting % .532 , 3 pt .379, FT. 774, Rebounds 12.4, assists 1.2, steals,1.3, blocks 1.6, PPG 26.2
same MPG played.
which is better?
Blake was a shitty Free throw shooter.I'd take B.
I'd take B.
Who are player A and B?
Blake was a shitty Free throw shooter.
Blake still is a shitty rebounder, rim protector for his size.
He played 2 Seasons. So, that freshman 14 ppg brings his total down.
With all that being said, Beasley was a far better OFFENSIVE player than Blake comig out of College.
It's not even close.
Blake just kills him in BEING INJURED
You have a point.
But, both have been disappointments in relation to their draft position.
#1 pick can't stay healthy, is immature and has a fur ball permanently lodged in his throat.
#2 pick can't stay off the weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed early in his career, gets cut by the Suns and is a NBA journeyman.
#Who'sTheTallestMidget
Beasley was a beast in College.Fuck that. I'd take Griffin.
Didn't know those were college numbers.