Wamu
whats-a-matta-u?
This is actually correct- seeing as though Gilbert has WAY more losing seasons under his belt. Jimmy is just playing catch up.
Don't worry, Jimmy's Lakers got several losing seasons in front of them.
This is actually correct- seeing as though Gilbert has WAY more losing seasons under his belt. Jimmy is just playing catch up.
This is actually correct- seeing as though Gilbert has WAY more losing seasons under his belt. Jimmy is just playing catch up.
Only to those people that have never ending issues w/ LeBron though.
Don't worry, Jimmy's Lakers got several losing seasons in front of them.
And yet I'm willing to bet he still doesn't catch Gilbert.
Well after reading this we certainly have different definitions of a "losing" season. Last I can recall the Cavs only have ONE title- which means to almost everyone else the other 11 seasons were losing ones.
Gilbert's now owned the Cavs for 12 years & has had 4 losing seasons. Since Jimmy took over (late in the '12-'13 season) they have had 3 consecutive losing seasons (27-55, 21-61 & 17-65). They also set the record for worst record in team history last year. If he's the owner long enough you might want to rethink your opinion that he'll have fewer losing seasons than Gilbert.
And the only one that probably has much left to give is Dirk. The rest should've retired a season or two or three ago.
Well after reading this we certainly have different definitions of a "losing" season. Last I can recall the Cavs only have ONE title- which means to almost everyone else the other 11 seasons were losing ones.
Don't worry, Jimmy's Lakers got several losing seasons in front of them.
Well as of now he still does if we're only counting the "real" winning seasons (you know, the ones that ended with a title). Also, my bet was on the contention that after LBJ the Cavs really will have nothing- we've seen how well Kyrie has done without him- and also the fact that the Lakers have young fresh talent that seem to be coming together well. So, I guess you kinda did some "dancing" of your own around those things too.As owner of the Lakers Buss has yet to even have a winning season. You said Buss would have fewer losing season as an owner than Gilbert. I like how you danced around that fact & brought up that the Cavs only have 1 ring. That has nothing @ all to do w/ which owner will have more losing seasons.
Paul Pierce, old twice dead mutha sucka.
Well as of now he still does if we're only counting the "real" winning seasons (you know, the ones that ended with a title). Also, my bet was on the contention that after LBJ the Cavs really will have nothing- we've seen how well Kyrie has done without him- and also the fact that the Lakers have young fresh talent that seem to be coming together well. So, I guess you kinda did some "dancing" of your own around those things too.
How many titles have the Lakers won w/ Jimmy Buss running things? I haven't danced around anything. You have endless issues w/ LeBron & the Cavs & nothing that can or could be said will change your mind. Funny that @ first you didn't even mention the Cavs after LeBron. That makes your argument even weaker. Why not focus on the current situation w/ those teams rather than looking into the future?
Shit, Jeanie gonna put his ass down if he takes another dump this Season.
Dude, you surprised they cut Hunter?
Danny overestimated his ability to flip those picks into a star.
Unreal that you cut a guy you drafted in the first round just a year ago.
The Kid hasn't shown much. But, He's no bum like Anthony Bennett.
So, I'm shocked no team was willing to absorb him.
I just can't get overly excited about the Celtics right now. Hope they have a better season than last year & at least win a playoff series. But if the Cavs are 100% I don't think there's a team in the E than can beat them in a 7 game series.
Oh, no doubt.
Everyone else is playing for second place in both conferences, barring trade or injury.
I just think it's cold blooded that the kid got cut on his 23rd birthday...lol
He can shoot. So, he won't be unemployed long.
First off- how can you tell me or anyone else that doesn't suck up to LBJ that we have endless issues with him? That's so ridiculous. Without contrast there would be no debate.How many titles have the Lakers won w/ Jimmy Buss running things? I haven't danced around anything. You have endless issues w/ LeBron & the Cavs & nothing that can or could be said will change your mind. Funny that @ first you didn't even mention the Cavs after LeBron. That makes your argument even weaker. Why not focus on the current situation w/ those teams rather than looking into the future?