WiggyRuss
Well-Known Member
no one is buying that 2 does not equal 3? lolNo one is buying any of this. Not one word.
no one is buying that 2 does not equal 3? lolNo one is buying any of this. Not one word.
What if Cavs offered TT & Shump for Melo, Kyle O'Quinn, & Brandon Jennings?
It works out salary wise, if the Cavs use up one of their several available exceptions
no one is buying that 2 does not equal 3? lol
just for conversation sake-No one is buying any of this. Not one word.
just for conversation sake-
how do you reconcile that?
that LeBron joined 2 all stars with zero playoff experience while Durant joined 3 with championship experience?--- how do you say that is the same? im being honest when i say i would LOVE to hear the argument and what its based on.
im just saying- i dont know where 2 equals 3...never seen that before.
very true....though jackson was trying to rid himself of Smiths deal which was part of his motivation.....so he could eventually sign- Joakin Noah, lol.Dude, Jackson didn't want Shump @ 3mil.
You think he's gonna take him back @9?
.....6.6 ppg career average for a sf.You think Melo is going to rebound? Seriously???
very true....though jackson was trying to rid himself of Smiths deal which was part of his motivation.....so he could eventually sign- Joakin Noah, lol.
jackson - not the brightest of gms, lol.
did i mischarecterize something?Try taking things out of context again.
Not total shit but very close.
did i mischarecterize something?
my argument is that i dont see how joining 2 all stars that have no playoff experience is the same as joining 3 al lstars with championship experience--- thus far no one has told me how that is somehow the same.
tahts why i am legitimately asking why you think the situations are the same. I honestly have no clue how it could be and am at a total loss.
dude - i am seriously trying to just realize your point of view on thisYou took things out of context yet again. The smart thing for you to do would be to drop it. You probably won't, so you likely won't be posting in this thread anymore.
dude - i am seriously trying to just realize your point of view on this
i just want to hear your argument becuase i seriously just dont see it--- maybe you do have a great argument
at this point we are obviously going in circles- and its pretty apparent that we are just going to have to agree to disagree.
anyway.....
im out--- think its gonna be a Wendy's night and HOPEFULLY a victory over the Twolves so i dont have to hear from people how great Wiggins is. lol....
just for conversation sake-
how do you reconcile that?
that LeBron joined 2 all stars with zero playoff experience while Durant joined 3 with championship experience?--- how do you say that is the same? im being honest when i say i would LOVE to hear the argument and what its based on.
im just saying- i dont know where 2 equals 3...never seen that before.
im out--- think its gonna be a Wendy's night
Because the # of All Stars is irrelevant. They each had the same intent. To join the team that offered them the best opportunity to win. Simple as that.
Yes....when guards are averaging equal or better IMO that's not great. Sorry.
Yep and to KD's credit he stayed in OKC longer than LBJ stayed in Cle the first time.Exactly. The bold is why I never criticized either of them for doing what they did. Why wait until you are old and no longer an elite player to chase rings when you can do it when you're younger and be one of the main guys? Especially if you have already given the team you're leaving ample opportunity to get you what you need to win.