Robotech
Well-Known Member
Yep the least they could have done was replay the possession. That was very unfair. From what I heard, Ross took 2.5 to get the shot off and there were only 2.4 left. There were only two ways to resolve this fairly.
1) Replay the last 2.4 seconds
2) Say fuck it and say the basket is good. Settle the game in OT
Why is Toronto at fault because there was a tool managing the clock? Seriously
To not give them a chance to even replay the possession is correct.
And FTR @Bolts is correct, can't blame the refs for that review. I believe everything excluding flagrants/ejections are now determined in Secaucus
I read that the lead official said that 2.5 seconds elapsed between the tip and Ross's release, but I wonder if they factored in that no timekeeper is capable of starting the clock at the exact same time as the tip because there is human reaction time involved. Even if it were possible, it's wrong to make that basket not count over a 0.1 second difference in the replay measurement. That should not be conclusive enough. There is enough uncertainty there that the shot should've stood.