nuraman00
Well-Known Member
What do you want to see tonight?
What do you want to see tonight?
I wanted to see a good game, with a tie going to Game 7. But I lost so much reason for not wanting Curry to get MVP and a championship (re: Stockton) that I didn't care any more. That "passion" didn't hold because I still think you need more than one year to pass him and won't pass him in my book anyway. Who cares about others' books. Bogut's a champion and Mark Jackson failed. I don't care for any reasoning otherwise, Mark Jackson failed.
Talking about Bogut, if we didn't have Gobert or if he were open to coming off the bench but playing some real minutes, I'd say we should get on the phone to the Warriors this off-season. But I doubt they want to trade him, we have Gobert, and I presume he wants to start.
I don't think Mark Jackson failed. This championship wasn't about just this year, it incorporated past years' efforts to get to this point.
Just like you need more than 1 year to become legendary as a player, this championship was not just incorporating this year's journey, but the previous two years as well.
Dennis Scott on NBA TV gave Mark Jackson some credit for getting the team to a good state.
My daughters are beautiful, I get no credit for luck nor genetics.
Nope. No credit for Mark Jackson. Purely coincidental that he was there a year before their ring; they underachieved losing to the Clippers. He had the MVP in Curry, the No. 1 overall pick in Bogut, and others. He wasn't the GM, so the drafted players and FA are not his doing. My daughters are beautiful, I get no credit for luck nor genetics.
Nope. No credit for Mark Jackson. Purely coincidental that he was there a year before their ring; they underachieved losing to the Clippers. He had the MVP in Curry, the No. 1 overall pick in Bogut, and others. He wasn't the GM, so the drafted players and FA are not his doing. My daughters are beautiful, I get no credit for luck nor genetics.
So if its a coincidence that Jackson was there the year before, then would Kerr have also lost the the Clippers in 2014?
The best way for Jackson to get no credit, is for the Warriors to have never have won the title. Then nothing could be linked to him.
That's why you should have continued rooting for the Cavaliers.
Or, to win it several roster makeovers later, like the Dallas example.
From Grantland:
++++++++++++++++
The Champs Are Here: A Guide to the Elite and Unlikely Cast of Characters Who Defined the 2014-15 Golden State Warriors
"Kerr overhauled a team culture that had grown poisonous, for well-documented reasons, under Jackson and his assistants. In his zeal to motivate players, Jackson fostered resentment among them and toward the front office. He fired two assistants, requested Jerry West stay away from practices, and asked a younger front-office official to stop rebounding for players, sources have said.
When Ezeli was injured last season, Jackson and his staff told the healthy players that Ezeli was cheering against them — so that he would look good, according to several team sources. Players confronted Ezeli in a meeting, and he wept at the accusation — which he denied."
Nope, no credit goes to Jackson. Kerr would have beaten the Clippers. If Jackson were there, they wouldn't have made the Finals. Curry would have unleashed his MVPness earlier had Kerr been coach the year before, and all tsunamis, earthquakes, and hurricanes, not to mention, tornadoes, would have ceased. Damn Jackson.
Golden State winning the Championship is the most direct way to show that Jackson had a talented roster who lost under him to the Clippers, a façade last year.
You're not going to change my mind on this one. But I know others want to wantonly give credit to anyone and everyone.