deanpet21
Well-Known Member
You are not listening and frankly I'm trying to get out of this argument.
Dean said it was a mistake to take Murphy earlier than they selected Moses.
Moses to date has outperformed both Murphy and Long in many people's opinion. Getting a solid starting RT in the middle of round three is outperforming your draft position, period.
Therefore Dean's original opinion that Moses should have been selected ahead of Murphy and that he has played better than both Murphy and Long appears to be spot on. This isn't revisionist history as your Tom Brady example implies, this was his position before any of these players were drafted.
its as simple as that but these fools cant understand that.