ElTexan
Board Chancellor Emeritus
I don't suppose. They don't need 162. Who claimed that?Seriously then, why would you suppose the sport of baseball needs 162 games to raise the cream when the other sports require at most half that?
I don't suppose. They don't need 162. Who claimed that?Seriously then, why would you suppose the sport of baseball needs 162 games to raise the cream when the other sports require at most half that?
All due respect, Mike Trout seems like he could be pretty good protection, no?
Yeah bro add your first kid to that big 4-0 too. Wouldn't have it any other way. Still feel and act 20
Where do u work in MO?
I don't suppose. They don't need 162. Who claimed that?
I'm adding my THIRD kid in two weeks. God help me.
I live in northeast Ohio, but work for a group out of MO. Forgive me, but because of my irreverent nature on here, I won't say who or where that group is. But I do fly into StL four or five times a year and will likely be at the cards opening day next year.
Looks like I gots a bit a readin' to do.
You argue like a millennial.Then you feel the length of baseball's regular season is redundant?
I'm adding my THIRD kid in two weeks. God help me.
I live in northeast Ohio, but work for a group out of MO. Forgive me, but because of my irreverent nature on here, I won't say who or where that group is. But I do fly into StL four or five times a year and will likely be at the cards opening day next year.
Holy shitballs, Champ. Hope you're getting the old snippity snip thereafter. I had #3 at forty and then had the plumbing rerouted.
You argue like a millennial.
It's long enough. That's all that matters.
In any sport, a season has to challenge endurance, or else it's just a game.
Baseball has made sure to make their season long enough. And not so long as to make endurance the overwhelming aspect.
Outside that, it has nothing to do with the argument at hand.
A seven game series is enough of a length to be comfortable with calling the winner the 'better' team.
FIVE would be too short.
Seven makes sure your ace gets a couple of starts and also that you're lesser pitchers have to pitch. It lets your batters break out of a mini slump. Etc. Seven is long enough.
Im no expert here, or anything.Yeah, I was hoping to have Mrs Redfoot's plumbing rerouted during the C-section, but her asshole doc advised against it. Said it should be mine. What if I lose my affable nature?
Yeah, I was hoping to have Mrs Redfoot's plumbing rerouted during the C-section, but her asshole doc advised against it. Said it should be mine. What if I lose my affable nature?
Would Nine games and lefties being required to step off before they throw to first be too much?You argue like a millennial.
It's long enough. That's all that matters.
In any sport, a season has to challenge endurance, or else it's just a game.
Baseball has made sure to make their season long enough. And not so long as to make endurance the overwhelming aspect.
Outside that, it has nothing to do with the argument at hand.
A seven game series is enough of a length to be comfortable with calling the winner the 'better' team.
FIVE would be too short.
Seven makes sure your ace gets a couple of starts and also that you're lesser pitchers have to pitch. It lets your batters break out of a mini slump. Etc. Seven is long enough.
Im no expert here, or anything.
But I don't think its the Proctologist who should be making these decisions.
That's exactly what he's doing.Ha! Buddy of mine is a urologist. Says, "dude, it's no big deal. Let's just get it done." I think he just wants to touch my balls.
It's really no big deal. I talked baseball with my guy, but didn't tell him I was a Giants fan until after. I had it done in Pasadena, so I didn't want to tempt fate with a Dodger fan with my nuts in his hands. Just get a bottle of bourbon and bag of frozen peas and settle in for the weekend.