Beengay fudgepackers
Packin since 1919
FIFYFair enough, I guess we have to agree to disagree. I'm taking the team I love team in the NBA because I am a homer right now.
FIFYFair enough, I guess we have to agree to disagree. I'm taking the team I love team in the NBA because I am a homer right now.
Fair enough, I guess we have to agree to disagree. I'm taking a well-rested Kyrie/Shump/Lebron/TT/Mozgov along with JR, Delly and James Jones off the bench over any team in the NBA with how they're playing right now.
I guess...which is kinda like you banking on Kyrie some how being cured of tendinitis in a week. And good luck to you as well my friend!
I will say this:
Not moving up the Finals is the best thing for the Cavs.
Kyrie will have had nearly 2 weeks rest.
If he is healthy?
Things will be very interesting.
Good Luck.
I am not anti-Lebron, nor anti-Cavs *fans*.
I'm glad he went home.
I think his stated reasoning was....suspect?
But, it can't be seen as the wrong choice considering he's back in the Finals.
I guess...which is kinda like you banking on Kyrie some how being cured of tendinitis in a week. And good luck to you as well my friend!
FIFY
Plus if LBJ covered either one he would get burnt out. He isn't that type of Defender anymore. He gets tired quicker now a days.
Well fortunately the Warriors don't have to depend on Barns' scoring to win games which has been proven in past series' so ANY scoring he provides is a bonus...unlike the Cavs & Kyrie. So I too, wish you Cavs fans good luck as well.Well a week a half of rest minus that game stint should get him to at least 85-90%. An 85-90 Kyrie can score 25 points and be effective. But Harrison playing like that, that wont happen again, he had like 25 points lol.
Is that a career-high? lol
Well fortunately the Warriors don't have to depend on Barns' scoring to win games which has been proven in past series' so ANY scoring he provides is a bonus...unlike the Cavs & Kyrie. So I too, wish you Cavs fans good luck as well.![]()
It's okay, Honey.
It happens to lots of guys.
Well as far as shooting they havent been very good from outside. Barbosa really doesnt count he averages less than 1 fgm from 3. Barnes is streaky. Iggy has never been a good shooter, he can sometimes. And green is below 30%, he can make them but sparingly. Not very consistent shooters at all.
Objectively speaking, you are comparing role players on the Cavs to prolific scorers on the Warriors. Players like Bogut, Iguodala, Barnes, Livingston, Speights and Lee are more than capable of shouldering more of the scoring load on the dubs, but they don't need to. Without Love and a hobbled Irving, the Cavs role players need to.Aww come on... if you can't beat 'em, root for 'em, right?
For reference, the Cavs have:
Kyrie: 48%
JR Smith: 39%
Shumpert: 37%
Delly: 36%
Jones: 35%
It is only a plus, we havent needed him so far, but of course playing this offense we will need him healthy.
I don't know why we are just debating offense though. Warriors a better defensive team, passing team, just about equal rebounding the ball, very long versitile team.
Exactly, Lebron is still the best in the game, but this Lebron isn't the same one that was able to shut down D-Rose for long stretches. This one is older and has a lot more mileage on him. I think the Cavs could successfully use him on Curry or Thompson for short stretches during some key moments. But every minute he has to spend checking one of them will likely cost them later.