NinerSickness
Well-Known Member
- 61,362
- 11,401
- 1,033
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 200.00
The dude has been injured and played 4 games.
4 games. Not 4 seasons. 4 games.
4 games. Not 4 seasons. 4 games.
Still too early to tell... First off, let the kid get healthy before we can see what he really CAN or CANNOT do. The NFL is a lot more physically demanding than college. Work ethic is definitely a cause for concern, but there's plenty of time for him to learn that. And it is very premature to label someone a bust solely due to injuries. Secondly, he made a position change entering the NFL so he will need some time to adjust. The 3-4 OLB is still "like" a DE, but it has different assignments.
The leap from 1st to 2nd year is almost always when you see a player's true talents. The kid had a lot to live up to right out of the gate, so I'm not surprised people are already wanting to label him a bust. For me, time will tell.
Time will tell.
The Seahawks drafted a guy named Curry. All the hype coming out of college and a physical specimen if there ever was one. A first round pick traded to the Raiders for a 7th. Teams miss so often on the so called can't miss picks.
A 3rd rounder to move up from the 6 to the 1? That's not a realistic trade for any team holding the top pick.
Injured or a Bust. I see no difference between the 2. Not playing is not playing.
Why is it not realistic?
That's the problem with the NFL valuation system...they tend to go on precedent vs the current market. The reality is...not all 1st overall players carry the same value. HOU chose to keep a player at a position they really didn't need because they could get value comparable to other 1st overall picks...
I agree that not all draft classes or players should carry the same value, but as in any business trades, there is a scale to maintain some type of consistency. And you can overpay, but very, very, very rarely will you underpay. And if you do, the difference is marginal. On the draft value chart, the top pick is worth 3k points, the 6 pick is worth 1,600 points, and Atlanta's 3rd round was worth 240 points. Atlanta probably could have still gotten him at a value, but the Texans simply are not going to give 1k+ point discount to anybody.
I get your point, but as a GM you need to understand it's a fluid marketplace...the points assigned to picks shouldn't be ironclad.
imo part of what made the ATL offer a good one for both teams was scheme wise Clowney was not a fit in HOU...and most teams knew that...coupled with the player's own question marks...they just were not going to get anything close to past trades...to not look foolish or fleeced, they chose to keep a player they really didn't need.
Agree on not playing is not playing, but imo totally different from playing and being a bust. One leaves a question, the other doesn't.
And I don't think they are ironclad. But 35% is a lot to swallow. He would have been a better fit in ATL, I agree, they just would have to come to the table with more than a 3rd rounder, for any team holding that top pick. I think it also speaks volumes that this "great" prospect didn't garner more of a push from traditional 4-3 teams than an offer for 65% of the charted value. And who knows, he may fit in a role for Houston enough not to take a bath in a trade. But without seeing the field….
Bigger bust: Clowney or Ryan Leaf?