- Thread starter
- #1
LB Kyle Van Noy Visiting the Redskins Today - Hogs Haven
here is another option at 34 . a lb who can play any lb position .
here is another option at 34 . a lb who can play any lb position .

This is interesting. Van Noy would obviously be there at #34. This speaks that they don't want to sign Rak long term. The drafting of this guy at #34 will cause chaos.
CBS compared him to Chad Greenway and OLB. walterfootball also said OLB. No one has said ILB
who said that? give me a link. Mosely was a ILB in Bama 3-4 defense.
It looks like his strength is OLb though.
Not at all. I like Amaro, Fuller, Mosely, Ward, Roby, and Hageman.
All guys that will likely be long gone before we pick most likely. Hell I would like us to pick Clowney. LOL
As for guys who might be there at 34, I would prefer we pick on talent and long term possible impact. Not just on position and current perceived needs is all Im saying.
all draft picks are for long term needs . even o/lineman
Agreed. How ever I think the desperation to take an O-lineman is more about the needs of now as apposed to long term. Face it, we still have young lineman that were drafted within the past two drafts that we really havent seen much of. We are no worse at the position than we were the last two years (RT in particular) And while Polumbus has not been an all pro, he is not a total slouch as some would portray him. Basically if we draft a RT at 34, we have got to cut Compton, Hurt and or Gettis. I know many will disagree, I just dont see the dire need to take an O-lineman high in the draft at the moment. I do still see a need at CB and WR. Hall and Porter are both a little long in the tooth. And we know we dont have much height at WR. Could also see a need at ILB. I think RT falls around 4th on the needs list actually. But deep down I fully expect them to take one, because if te FO is half as panic'd as the fan base, then they will over value the position to the exclusion of all else.