New Top 10...interesting

[Wild Turkey]

I am still trying to figure out who Bama played.

They barely beat an A&M team that has NO defense. They still play a LSU team that lost to Ole Piss (haven't in 11 years), Auburn is the best team they play. Auburn.

tOSU played Wisky and NW (suck but looked good early), Penn St , Michigan.

I don't see a big difference. Wisky could beat LSU, Auburn, and A&M IMO

Whiskey couldn't beat Ole Miss put the crack pipe down.

 

[Shanemansj13]

NW has NEVER looked good, they were one of the most overrated teams of this entire season.

Also Alabama beat that Ole Miss team, and did you forget about Va. Tech? I guess so, at least they challenged themselves OOC.

Va Tech has squeaked out wins against shit teams since Bama. They have a solid D, but they have played absolute shit.

 

[Shanemansj13]

Whiskey couldn't beat Ole Miss put the crack pipe down.

Wisky has the same style playcalling as Bama and we saw what happened there.

Only reason they beat LSU is bc of 3 Mettenfucker picks. Wisky doesn't throw much

 

[ericd7633]

Va Tech has squeaked out wins against shit teams since Bama. They have a solid D, but they have played absolute shit.

Jesus man according to you the only good teams are Bama, Oregon, FSU, Ohio State and Wisconsin. You're giving no credit to ANY of the teams that Bama has played(or will play) and propping up of all teams Penn State(who lost to IU) LSU has a GREAT win by beating Auburn. Penn State/Michigan do not. Penn State has 2 losses, like LSU, and Michigan has played a garbage schedule, and has looked bad against it.

 

[ericd7633]

Va Tech has squeaked out wins against shit teams since Bama. They have a solid D, but they have played absolute shit.

So I can't name Va. Tech as quality because they have beaten "shit" teams. Yet you're going to argue Michigan and Penn State are tough games? What exactly have Penn State and Michigan played then? Are you going to tell me they've played a good schedule?

 

[mad4comp]

Va Tech has squeaked out wins against shit teams since Bama. They have a solid D, but they have played absolute shit.

an OSU fan talking about squeaking out wins?

 

[john01992]

Well while trolling Bama you like to bad mouth all southerners. Its kinda like if you were black and I was using all kinds of racist remarks to describe the guy sitting next to you and he was black.

Using hate speech to talk about southerners in general is no different than using hate speech to describe a gay person or a black person, and you do it all the time. That is why I say we dont always see eye to eye.

to be fair LA is only 3rd to last in most racist stats after AL & MS so im not really making fun of LA people specifically as much as im making fun of the bammers & rebels

 

[Shanemansj13]

an OSU fan talking about squeaking out wins?

We didn't play ECU, Marshall, GTech, NC, and fucking Pitt

Talk about garbage

We played Iowa, Wisky, and NW

Just a little bit different....just a little

 

[ericd7633]

We didn't play ECU, Marshall, GTech, NC, and fucking Pitt

Talk about garbage

We played Iowa, Wisky, and NW

Just a little bit different....just a little

so Iowa and NW are fucking good? Jesus christ man. lol.

 

[Shanemansj13]

So I can't name Va. Tech as quality because they have beaten "shit" teams. Yet you're going to argue Michigan and Penn State are tough games? What exactly have Penn State and Michigan played then? Are you going to tell me they've played a good schedule?

You can. The difference is that is all they have played. Even the ACC teams they layed are absolute garbage.

At least Michigan beat ND---someone with a pulse

Penn St hasn't relly played anyone, only lost by 3 to the team that beat Louisville. They have shown something is what I am saying, Va Tech not so much

 

[mad4comp]

We didn't play ECU, Marshall, GTech, NC, and fucking Pitt

Talk about garbage

We played Iowa, Wisky, and NW

Just a little bit different....just a little

Not really...... You just named 3 pretty mediocre teams as well..

 

[ericd7633]

You can. The difference is that is all they have played. Even the ACC teams they layed are absolute garbage.

At least Michigan beat ND---someone with a pulse

Penn St hasn't relly played anyone, only lost by 3 to the team that beat Louisville. They have shown something is what I am saying, Va Tech not so much

ND is very mediocre this year, beating them is no big deal.

 

[Shanemansj13]

so Iowa and NW are fucking good? Jesus christ man. lol.

Way better than that list above.

Iowa had the #1 RZ D in the nation, disn't gove up 1 rushing TD all season. Had top 10 ruahing D. Had the #7 rushing offense. They gave NIU a game (BCS team)

 

[Shanemansj13]

Not really...... You just named 3 pretty mediocre teams as well..

There is a difference between 8 or 9 win teams than 6.

 

[mad4comp]

There is a difference between 8 or 9 win teams than 6.

Oh really nostradumbass? GT and Pitt have as good a chance to get 8-9 wins as NW and Iowa do..

 

[ericd7633]

Way better than that list above.

Iowa had the #1 RZ D in the nation, disn't gove up 1 rushing TD all season. Had top 10 ruahing D. Had the #7 rushing offense. They gave NIU a game (BCS team)

They've played 3 teams with a pulse and lost all of them. They aren't good. They are the definition of a 6-6 team.

 

[ChrisperJ10]

Every team in the top 25 sucks! Every team in College football isn't worthy! Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz...Wait until bowl season.:bawling

 

[Shanemansj13]

Oh really nostradumbass? GT and Pitt have as good a chance to get 8-9 wins as NW and Iowa do..

Are you comparing Pitt and GT to Iowa and NW. Those two teams are mich more solid teams than your two. Btw...NW hasn't had their best player since the OSU game. He throws, runs and catches.

 

[Shanemansj13]

They've played 3 teams with a pulse and lost all of them. They aren't good. They are the definition of a 6-6 team.

B1G>ACC

 

[Shanemansj13]

Why do I bother. Comparing teams is really worthless, worthless. We go through this every year, any team can beat any team. Well almost every team.

Good talk.