Hmm pretty sure most of America saw it a different way. If Lynch doesn't fumble inside Falcons 20-30 yard territory, the defense doesn't choke on the last series, and Clemons (the top pass rusher by far on Seattle) is healthy when basically everyone on the Falcons was, Seattle clearly annihilates Atlanta on the road playing one extra game.
Dunno what you were watching, but Seattle started a little slow but very equally matched Atlanta. Both teams with 2 turnovers, Seattle put up nearly 500 yards, Altanta surrendered no sacks but that was against a team without their best pass rusher who went out the prior week, Atlanta had a week of rest, and Sherman aside from one TD stonewalled White.
Atlanta is just not that great of a team. Matt Ryan has proven he is capable of making some very good plays on the final drives of games, but has not proven he can take over any sort of demanding mental game early on. He lets teams back in games. In the second half aside from the last drive Ryan just went comatose and allowed Seattle to charge right back in. He was the WHOLE reason Seattle basically won the game. So what, he made a couple nice throws to the best WR core in NFL history the last few minutes. He still allowed Seattle to get everything going.
Who has the better team, the better QB and the better all around talent?
Hmm pretty sure most of America saw it a different way. If Lynch doesn't fumble inside Falcons 20-30 yard territory, the defense doesn't choke on the last series, and Clemons (the top pass rusher by far on Seattle) is healthy when basically everyone on the Falcons was, Seattle clearly annihilates Atlanta on the road playing one extra game.
Dunno what you were watching, but Seattle started a little slow but very equally matched Atlanta. Both teams with 2 turnovers, Seattle put up nearly 500 yards, Altanta surrendered no sacks but that was against a team without their best pass rusher who went out the prior week, Atlanta had a week of rest, and Sherman aside from one TD stonewalled White.
Atlanta is just not that great of a team. Matt Ryan has proven he is capable of making some very good plays on the final drives of games, but has not proven he can take over any sort of demanding mental game early on. He lets teams back in games. In the second half aside from the last drive Ryan just went comatose and allowed Seattle to charge right back in. He was the WHOLE reason Seattle basically won the game. So what, he made a couple nice throws to the best WR core in NFL history the last few minutes. He still allowed Seattle to get everything going.
It is very possible that the 49ers, Falcons and Seahawks are the 2nd, 3rd and 4th best teams in the NFL, respectively.
1. you said the 49ers were the best team by a MILE
2. The seahawks beat the hell out of the 49ers last time they played
3. this makes you wrong
Since when does losing 50-17 mean the Bills beat the Seahawks?Just out of curiosity:
The bills beat the seahawks last year, does that make them better?
The seahawks beat the pats in seattle. I won't try to argue the pats are a better team (although I won't say that they are not either) but I remember it took a real breakdown by the pats secondary to let the hawks back into that game in the 4th quarter and I also remember the pats putting up a ton of yards on that vaunted defense. Now the pats also did that to the 49rs, but the fact that it was in foxboro, that the pats hadn't lost a home game in december in about 10 years and that the 49rs were sitting on a huge lead before the pats came back makes it a little different.
Seahawks look to be a good young talented team, but they are going to have to do more than get hot one year to prove they are more than that. You ask most people outside of the seattle fan base which team you don't want to see more, especially if the game is not in the opponents stadium, the answer won't be seattle.
Since when does losing 50-17 mean the Bills beat the Seahawks?
Since when does losing 50-17 mean the Bills beat the Seahawks?
I agree wholeheartedly.
BTW I am a "he" or at least the last time my wife checked. You are going to have to take my word that she would be willing to confirm that.
lol at all of this
I see the Falcons every week.
Not that great...Agree. ATL is a very good team, but they have too many holes to be a great team imo. They are well above average in the passing game, they are well coached meaning they don't make a lot of mental mistakes, and that allows them to beat the teams with lessor talent more often than not. If you have watched them much under coach Smith...they rarely lose to bad football teams.
Ryan...I think you're 100% wrong on the mental angle. In fact I would put that part of his game up there with P Manning. What Ryan is not is a great athlete...he doesn't have a cannon arm, doesn't run fast, etc. So...what that means is his feet need to be set for him to throw accurately down field. If the pocket is collasping, he gets pushed off his spot, the play breaks down...unless his check down is open, Ryan is most likely going to get rid of the ball and live for another play, or punt it...he's not an extend the play type of QB.
Let them back in the game...you're 100% right, they did it in both playoff games. But...imo the culprit is the OC, and or the HC. Early second half in the SEA & SF games Koetter (OC) tried to take the air out of the ball too soon with Turner. That led to a couple of 3 & outs, or 1 or 2 1st down drives and punts, and the mo switched sides.
Overall talent - SF
Best QB/WR - ATL
I will say, I'm not sold on 1st yr starting QBs in year 2 as the starter...Both Kaep & RW are very good talents...I still need to see how they perform when DCs know a little more about their games.
Who has the better team, the better QB and the better all around talent?
Team
San Fran
Atlanta
Seattle
QB
Ryan
Kaep
Wilson
Talent
Same as team
If I remember correctly, the Falcons eliminated the shehawks in last years playoffs..the score was close but the game looked very lopsided in the falcons favor.