- Thread starter
- #1
nothing will come of this. lool at you krafty for getting so worked up.![]()
the problem with that date is its right during training camp.. it needs to be moved either before or after otherwise it will be huge media distraction..
LMAO So the courts should accommodate the Patriots?
Yes, it is a problem, NO they should not accomodate the Patriots ? Seriously.. you dont see how this could be a problem?
Yes, it is a problem, NO they should not accomodate the Patriots ? Seriously.. you dont see how this could be a problem?
Not only that.. its not just Patriots.. I had a court case moved that i was to testify in because of a schedule conflict with one of the defendants. court cases are moved Very frequently. Do not have partial treatment to a Patriot, just pointing out the obvious.
A problem for whom? You stated the date needed to be moved because of training camp, pretty dumb comment. The courts needn't consider when training camp is, has nothing at all to do with it.
Training camp directly affects his ability to perform well at his job and directly affects his income or livelyhood. Not possitive abou this contract but many players have incentives for attending such things and performance based. Things like this are concidered all the time no matter what the profession of the accused is.
how many court cases are you personally invloved with? It happens all the time for all sorts of stupid reasons as well.
If you can not see the porblems it would cause then , im sorry.
"its not a question of where it grips it its a question of weight ratios.."
So again you feel the courts should accommodate the Pats? You seem to want to dance around the question. And these things while they may occur are by no means the norm.
I'll chime in...No, the courts should not accomodate the Pats, or any other team, sport, company business etc. any more than it would another team, sport, company or business etc.
And these things (delay, postpone, reschedule, change of venue) happen with enough frequency that they are in fact the norm.
At least we agree they should not accommodate the Pats or Dennard
Not any more than any other would be accomodated. If his legal crew files the proper paperwork with the courts that an extension be granted due to potential hardships posed on either the person charged, his/her employer, or both, than the courts in all fairness should grant said extension if the precedence has been set in other similar cases.
Not any more than any other would be accomodated. If his legal crew files the proper paperwork with the courts that an extension be granted due to potential hardships posed on either the person charged, his/her employer, or both, than the courts in all fairness should grant said extension if the precedence has been set in other similar cases.