I bet.....at least not like the NFL where you have to wait a week.This been a very depressing day
This one will hurt more than last year which in the grand scheme of things doesn't make sense because they were the 8th seed while last year they had the 1 seed with a game 7 at homeI bet.....at least not like the NFL where you have to wait a week.
Sure but it's understandable if they get your hopes up going 3-0 then become the first not to close it out...This one will hurt more than last year which in the grand scheme of things doesn't make sense because they were the 8th seed while last year they had the 1 seed with a game 7 at home
Because of the 3-0 angle I cannot think of any loss by one of my teams like this one. Only one that might come close (and maybe worse if you are like me and like football a lot more than bball) is The Drive loss. Similar in that Browns took the lead then looked to have it won when we pinned them on the 2.Watch the series finale of succession shortly after 9 then take a sleeping pill shortly after. Need be May 29th already
Thank you!Game 6 for Miami = Lock of the Century.
GAme 7 for Miami is the Lock of the Century.....Thank you!
whats your succession prediction?Watch the series finale of succession shortly after 9 then take a sleeping pill shortly after. Need be May 29th already
Thank you!GAme 7 for Miami is the Lock of the Century.....
no doubt winnner winner chicken dinner.
L2M is out. What everyone debated was called correctly. They did miss a lane violation on Caleb Martin and then a foul committed by Gabe Vincent.
L2M Report
official.nba.com
Comment: | Replay review of the foul called on Horford (BOS) pursuant to a coach's challenge was deemed unsuccessful. Horford (BOS) made contact with Butler (MIA) during his shooting motion and a foul was warranted. During the review, the Replay Center Official also determined that i) the foul occurred at 3.0 seconds and adjusted the clock accordingly; and ii) Butler's shot attempt was taken from behind the three-point line, and therefore three free throws were awarded. |
It absolutely was not a goal tend. The goal tend was only called because his hand was on the rim. Seems like a double penalty.
The guy has both hands on the ball and gets an extra 2-3 steps out of mishandling it. The ref can make a call on that if he wants. Can also let it go. Gets a step after putting both hands on ball, then drops it then another 1-2 after dropping it.
But not gonna keep this going on this thread...if you think I'm wrong that's cool.
I get it, but someone was saying without the hand on the rim it was still a goal tend. Not true.Ummm…
If the defender’s hand is on the rim?
Then it is 100% a goal tend.
Defender can’t touch the rim or the backboard while the shot is in the air.