• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

JDR

gkekoa

Well-Known Member
23,443
4,385
293
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Location
somewhere over the rainbow
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Quite full of yourself are you? “I have historic ideas!!” Of course you do. Uuuuuge ideas! Bigly ones! Covfefe.

I’m sure Californians would say that their idea (ideals?) have value and are historic.
They do but they are too stupid to realize things such as men and women are distinct entities. They are not fluid.

They have distinct ideas about sex also. Things like have as many partners as you want and don’t be committed. But it doesn’t stop there. They want to pretend like a two parent household is not superior to a single parent household, for the child.
I’m sure that Californians might say that if you take the xxxxxxxxx community out of the picture in wherever you live, there would be no redeeming quality.

Actually, no, I take that back. If you think that the only redeeming quality to all of the California is the Hispanic community, you’re a fucking moron. The Great Central Valley is a farmer’s paradise, the northern coast is full of biodiversity, Big Sur is one of the natural wonders of the world, San Diego has military importance and phenomenal weather, LA has some of the most diverse enclaves on the planet, San Francisco has one of the largest population of Chinese people outside of China on the planet, and houses an absolutely magical place to watch a ballgame, and is the birthplace of the Grateful Dead.

It is but the government is dominated by liberals. The farmers aren’t really Californians. That is why most of California wants to flee and become independent, but the cities prevents. The other 90% of land from being able to do that.
Northern California is mostly red.
Military is mostly red.
I know San Francisco is full of shit on the streets and was once great.

I know that Californians wouldnt be as stupidly close-minded as to limit their worldview of wherever you live to a single solitary characteristic of it.

Who is limiting it to a single characteristic? California is shit because of all the characteristics combined.
 

chillerdab

Well-Known Member
7,179
3,523
293
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Your views are your views, which makes them
one person’s views.

Some Californians might even agree with all of your views.

On the other hand, some oklahomans definitely disagreee with all of your views.

Those people - in deep red republican strongholds - definitely think gender is fluid, that there is not really anything wrong with premarital sex, that a child raised by a single parent can go on to be just as successful in life as somebody raised by two parents.

Those people would also agree with me that your characterization of SF as being full of shit on the streets is whack, ignorant, and downright stupid.

Surely, those people would argue, there is nothing about SF that would make it a city that has MORE shit on it’s streets than Oklahoma City, or Lincoln, Nebraska, or Kansas City Kansas, is there?

The Military being red and some of Northern California being red is irrelevant, because most of California is blue.

Your opinion about who is a Californian and what they want to do is also simply that - your opinion.
 
Last edited:

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
  • The following is a list of California locations by voter registration. In February 2019, California had 19,978,449 registered voters, comprising 79.09% of its total eligible voters. Of those registered voters, 8,612,368 (43.11 percent) were registered Democrats, and 4,709,851 (23.57 percent) were Republicans.
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Your views are your views, which makes them
one person’s views.

Some Californians might even agree with all of your views.

On the other hand, some oklahomans definitely disagreee with all of your views.

Those people - in deep red republican strongholds - definitely think gender is fluid, that there is not really anything wrong with premarital sex, that a child raised by a single parent can go on to be just as successful in life as somebody raised by two parents.

Those people would also agree with me that your characterization of SF as being full of shit on the streets is whack, ignorant, and downright stupid.

Surely, those people would argue, there is nothing about SF that would make it a city that has MORE shit on it’s streets than Oklahoma City, or Lincoln, Nebraska, or Kansas City Kansas, is there?

The Military being red and some of Northern California being red is irrelevant, because most of California is blue.

Your opinion about who is a Californian and what they want to do is also simply that - your opinion.
statistically 72% of children raised in single parents homes end up in poverty . so 7 out of 10 dont succeed
there are 2 sexes , male and female and only one can get pregnant
no one cares about premarital sex
there are numerous stories about SF , maybe some in the other cities you mentioned
 

chillerdab

Well-Known Member
7,179
3,523
293
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
statistically 72% of children raised in single parents homes end up in poverty . so 7 out of 10 dont succeed
there are 2 sexes , male and female and only one can get pregnant
no one cares about premarital sex
there are numerous stories about SF , maybe some in the other cities you mentioned

1. Link? Because that smells like your usual bullshit.
2. Your opinion, and therefor not relevant to this discussion.
3. Your opinion, but probably gekoka disagrees.
4. Link, because this also smells like your usual bullshit.

Go ahead and post your usual, “look for yourself,” excuse. Either that, and be my bitch and find me a link.
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
1. Link? Because that smells like your usual bullshit.
2. Your opinion, and therefor not relevant to this discussion.
3. Your opinion, but probably gekoka disagrees.
4. Link, because this also smells like your usual bullshit.

Go ahead and post your usual, “look for yourself,” excuse. Either that, and be my bitch and find me a link.
Look for yourself it’s there
There are 2 sexes male or female and that’s the science
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Chiller I could have sex for 1000 yrs and you will never drop an egg into your own natural uterus and have a sperm unite with that egg or carry a child or nurse a child with your own natural born with mammaries

There are 2 sexes male and female which which have organs unique to them at birth naturally

Having operations or feelings will not change that and most certainly wearing the opposite sexes clothes will not either

That doesn’t mean anyone should be discriminated against and deserve equal protection under the law
 

chillerdab

Well-Known Member
7,179
3,523
293
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Look for yourself it’s there
There are 2 sexes male or female and that’s the science

Bingo! Bullshit as usual! Spouting off opinions and presenting them as facts, then refusing to back up what you said with sources. Straight out of the republican playbook.

Thanks for playing!
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Bingo! Bullshit as usual! Spouting off opinions and presenting them as facts, then refusing to back up what you said with sources. Straight out of the republican playbook.

Thanks for playing!
there are only 2 sexes .
 

chillerdab

Well-Known Member
7,179
3,523
293
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
there are only 2 sexes .

Honest question: Do you understand the difference between sexual identity and gender identity?

I'm guessing, "not in the slightest."

Need a link?
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Honest question: Do you understand the difference between sexual identity and gender identity?

I'm guessing, "not in the slightest."

Need a link?
I don’t give a fuck what you identify as
 

chillerdab

Well-Known Member
7,179
3,523
293
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I don’t give a fuck what you identify as

I identify as your fucking daddy, but that's not what I asked.

You don't know the difference, just like I said. Poor reading comprehension on your part again.
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I identify as your fucking daddy, but that's not what I asked.

You don't know the difference, just like I said. Poor reading comprehension on your part again.
Ok genius explain it
 

gkekoa

Well-Known Member
23,443
4,385
293
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Location
somewhere over the rainbow
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Your views are your views, which makes them
one person’s views.

Some Californians might even agree with all of your views.

On the other hand, some oklahomans definitely disagreee with all of your views.

Those people - in deep red republican strongholds - definitely think gender is fluid, that there is not really anything wrong with premarital sex, that a child raised by a single parent can go on to be just as successful in life as somebody raised by two parents.

You seem to misunderstand. I am not saying some cant. I am saying it is much harder according to statistics.

Those people would also agree with me that your characterization of SF as being full of shit on the streets is whack, ignorant, and downright stupid.

Surely, those people would argue, there is nothing about SF that would make it a city that has MORE shit on it’s streets than Oklahoma City, or Lincoln, Nebraska, or Kansas City Kansas, is there?

Literal shit…not figurative
The Military being red and some of Northern California being red is irrelevant, because most of California is blue.
It is very relevant. Large swaths of area are being controlled politically by people who do not support their values, even when the area is predominantly red.
Your opinion about who is a Californian and what they want to do is also simply that - your opinion.
 

gkekoa

Well-Known Member
23,443
4,385
293
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Location
somewhere over the rainbow
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
1. Link? Because that smells like your usual bullshit.
2. Your opinion, and therefor not relevant to this discussion.
3. Your opinion, but probably gekoka disagrees.
4. Link, because this also smells like your usual bullshit.

Go ahead and post your usual, “look for yourself,” excuse. Either that, and be my bitch and find me a link.

Do I think premarital sex is a sin…yes.

Do I Think people should be free to have premarital sex? Of course I do.
 

chillerdab

Well-Known Member
7,179
3,523
293
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Large swaths of area being red means exactly jack and shit. More people reside in DC than Wyoming, Manhattan than North Dakota, etc.

More people are democratic in America than Republican.

Sorry not sorry
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,450
20,104
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Large swaths of area being red means exactly jack and shit. More people reside in DC than Wyoming, Manhattan than North Dakota, etc.

More people are democratic in America than Republican.

Sorry not sorry
Except for that pesky constitution and the constitutional EC , which gives all state equal say . There would be no reason for small population states to be in the union if their needs and concerns weren’t addressed. And only a fool would think they wouldn’t band together and leave but rather just do one at a time
 

gkekoa

Well-Known Member
23,443
4,385
293
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Location
somewhere over the rainbow
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Except for that pesky constitution and the constitutional EC , which gives all state equal say . There would be no reason for small population states to be in the union if their needs and concerns weren’t addressed. And only a fool would think they wouldn’t band together and leave but rather just do one at a time
You would think people would be more inclined to allow others to live free if they were actually Democratic. Shouldn’t people be governed by those with their interests?
Nope…as usual, democrats want to control other people.
 

chillerdab

Well-Known Member
7,179
3,523
293
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Is it democrats that are making laws against transgendered people, deplorables?

Passing laws to control what is taught in school? Who says gay? Who does what worh their body? Who can claim bullshit “religious freedom” to deny services of orhers?

Is it democrats that are eliminating rights of others?

No, it is not. Its your team.

If there is a law to be made that virtue signals hate, fear, or derision, it is alwaysalways always always made by ignorant, hateful, fearful, small minded republicans.
 
Top