Seems like this is a common question for the Bears each year since '85
the bears are a defensive team.Bears shouldn't have got Foles. I think Cam or Jameis (after his new eye surgery) is much better than these 2 for this team.
the bears are a defensive team.
Having the offense turn the ball over is the worst thing that team needs
I'm sure they wouldn't have Jameis throwing nearly as much as Tampa did. Also Cam is better than these 2 as well.
No one is claiming Foles is a great QB.Foles has limitations and Trubisky is erratic.
Foles most likely will win the competitive battle over Trubisky but that isn't saying much.No one is claiming Foles is a great QB.
They didnt pay for a great QB. They paid for some stability. So like I said.....
Same.I don't think this competition is really open. Something tells me Mitch will get the 1st team reps and start the first 2 preseason games.
the whole point of this thread is just that. QB competition for the bears.Foles most likely will win the competitive battle over Trubisky but that isn't saying much.
If we fix the oline, Run game, TE, and call better plays we can win with either of these QBs. If we don't fix these things both will fail. Bears are not giving up on Trubisky just yet. Foles will have to clearly out play him. If they wanted to replace Trubisky the would have spent more and got better then Foles. They just wanted to push Trubs and have a reasonable plan B.
The Bears still need help at most positions on offense. Their defense is in great shape.That's all you need to fix? Wasn't last year just get the kicker position filled and the Bears are Superbowl bound? Are you sure that's all you need to get fixed???