Shaqdaddy11
MVP

Agree with all that.
But Covington is a better defender and will be making less money.
I don’t think they difference in production will be worth how much more Bogdan will be making. And quite a few teams out there would probably have a greater need for Covington’s skill set.
You may be right that Covington would be the better player to get. But I would be very surprised if the Wolves got more than the Kings if they both traded their guys.
I’m just trying to help...
You are such a pussy ass bitch.The requirement was that you take back the "Your assumption that Milwaukee is the only destination" phrase you deliberately, stupidly and by trolling attempted for once more to put in my mouth like you've done a zillion time before... You didn't apologize, therefore the ignore is the only place you belong, you dickhead troll... Fuck you!
The other requirement was for you to beat this: Bledsoe to the Wolves, Covington + Brown + Connaughton + Wilson + Bucks 2x2nds (both from Indy) to the Kings + Exchange on 1sts between Wolves and Bucks (Wolves get Indy's 1st, Bucks get Wolves 1st)... You again failed to reply on subject BECAUSE YOU CAN'T ...MORON!
MALAKA!
You are such a pussy ass bitch.
What is ‘trolling’???
The song is decent but that Eddie Van Halen guitar solo is one of my favorites he ever did
I think you are being very generous with your trade analysis.
Bledsoe has ability but he's also got a LOT of baggage. Why would the Wolves want Bledsoe in exchange for an effective 3 and D player on a cheap contract? And they are going to give up their 1st round pick and take the playoff bound Pacers pick instead? That's just a ridiculous offer.
The Kings side is only marginally better given that if the Kings put BB on the market, there will be 15 teams calling them to see what it would take to get him. Why are they going to take a bunch of young role players and 2nd round picks when they would almost certainly get far better offers from other teams?
Trade should read like this of course (Kings have nothing to do with it):
Pistons receive: Matthews, Connaughton, Wilson + (some garbage from Wolves) and 1st from Wolves + 2x2nds from Bucks (both from Indy)
Kings receive: Bledsoe + Markieff Morris + Bucks 1st (from Indy)
Bucks receive: Covington + Rose + 1st from Pistons.
You note the Kings have nothing to do with it, but have them receiving players and a pick, and have Indy giving up picks but not receiving anything?
Trade should read like this of course (Kings have nothing to do with it):
Pistons receive: Matthews, Connaughton, Wilson + (some garbage from Wolves) and 1st from Wolves + 2x2nds from Bucks (both from Indy)
Kings receive: Bledsoe + Markieff Morris + Bucks 1st (from Indy)
Bucks receive: Covington + Rose + 1st from Pistons.
Why would the Pistons do this? Who the hell would play point guard for them? They and Sac will have about the same record, so no real change on the first and 2 seconds that will amount to what, a couple spots filled on their G-League roster? The combined PER for the three players that Detroit picks up is barely higher than Roses alone--that is not a good thing since you can't add player PER together on the court.You seem to be thicker than any rock in this world on everything you ever say...
Convington for Bledsoe would be a negative trade for the Wolves? Are you serious or you are trying hard to prove yourself the ultimate idiot there ever existed?
Heck, even the Trade machine gives the Bucks -3 wins and the Wolves +4 if one tries the (straight) trade...
NBA Trade Machine - ESPN
There is no way the Kings can get a better starting PG than Bledsoe or on a better contract and the exchange of the 1st picks for No-18 is a fair difference for them to pay...
Additionally, don't you know that the Wolves are desperately looking for a starting PG?
Like what? They wouldn't even get a player of Covington's alone caliper back... Not to mention the contract sizes and the salary they save for next season...
In fact, BB's salary for next season maybe what would stop the Backs to pursue BB this season and go for Derrick Roze instead...
This could work well...
Pistons receive: Matthews, Connaughton, Wilson + (some garbage from Wolves) and Sacramento's 1st + 2x2nds from Bucks (both from Indy)
Kings receive: Bledsoe + Markieff Morris + Bucks 1st (from Indy)
Bucks receive: Covington + Rose + 1st from Pistons.
Why would the Pistons do this? Who the hell would play point guard for them? They and Sac will have about the same record, so no real change on the first and 2 seconds that will amount to what, a couple spots filled on their G-League roster? The combined PER for the three players that Detroit picks up is barely higher than Roses alone--that is not a good thing since you can't add player PER together on the court.
No. No. and No
Trade should read like this of course (Kings have nothing to do with it):
Pistons receive: Matthews, Connaughton, Wilson + (some garbage from Wolves) and 1st from Wolves + 2x2nds from Bucks (both from Indy)
Kings receive: Bledsoe + Markieff Morris + Bucks 1st (from Indy)
Bucks receive: Covington + Rose + 1st from Pistons.
While all that is good, it does not explain why they would do the Bucks such a huge favor for scraps. Plus Reggie Jackson has proven not the solution and at his best doesn't do what rose is doing.The Pistons are in a partial rebuilt mode and Rose isn't included in their future plans due to age... They were granted 9.2M in DPE (disabled player exception) due to Griffin's injury and this can be used as trade exception... This is big for them because they have lots of cap space for next season and can go for a big trade with a team that needs cap space in order to add a young star next to Doumbouya. They also have Jarren Jackson back who is their starting PG and is expiring this season, if they add the DPE on him, they can even go for Russell... especially if it is a three team trade.