Trent Dilfer vs Jimmy Garoppolo playoff stats

[HaroldSeattle]

We all know the Ravens dumped Dilfer after winning the Superbowl due to being so limited. His stats confirm that. So I was wondering how his numbers stack up vs Jimmy G. Dilfert had 4 games vs 2 thus far for Jimmy, so I averaged the numbers. Here are the numbers.
Attempted passes per game: Dilfer 18.25 Jimmy 13.25
Completions per game: Dilfert 8.75 Jimmy 8.5
Yards per game: Dilfer 147.5 Jimmy 100.5
TDs in 4 games Dilfer had 3. Jimmy in 2 games has 1

Who has the better stats in the playoffs?

 

[megalodon30]

Too bad the Ravens didn't do that to Flacco. At least not until it was way too late.

 

[Gatorchip]

I mean, I get messing up Garoppolo's name, as you did here. It's a strange name, and the double r is weird, but I'll allow it.

But Dilfer is very easy. The random T at the end is nearly as bad at @Brees#1 trying to spell Mahomes.

 

[Inquisitor95]

I mean, I get messing up Garoppolo's name, as you did here. It's a strange name, and the double r is weird, but I'll allow it.

But Dilfer is very easy. The random T at the end is nearly as bad at @Brees#1 trying to spell Mahomes.

What about Trent Dilbert?

 

[Pattersonca65]

This is really lame. The 49ers should have stopped running the ball at 7 yards per carry the last game to prove Jimmy G can pass for more yards.

 

[Ricky Roma]

This is really lame. The 49ers should have stopped running the ball at 7 yards per carry the last game to prove Jimmy G can pass for more yards.

Given the OP...did you expect anything different? I mean....he failed miserably when he tried to show how 'bad' Garoppolo was by listing QB's by passing yards....yup....the stat that Jameis Winston led in.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

This is really lame. The 49ers should have stopped running the ball at 7 yards per carry the last game to prove Jimmy G can pass for more yards.

Just a comparison of their playoff stats. Raven won the Superbowl with Dilfer, so it's not like they should of done anything different either.

 

[megalodon30]

Given the OP...did you expect anything different? I mean....he failed miserably when he tried to show how 'bad' Garoppolo was by listing QB's by passing yards....yup....the stat that Jameis Winston led in.

Same kind of people that make the argument that Eli Manming is one of the best QBs of all time. Like we should be impressed because he threw for a lot of yards.

 

[Shanemansj13]

I'm guessing Trent didn't fuck a p0rnstar though. Both game managers, it's like splitting hairs

 

[Mofo]

@Tom Ace

 

[The Derski]

I'm guessing Trent didn't fuck a p0rnstar though. Both game managers, it's like splitting hairs

A p*rn star thats looks like an ogre with bowling ball tits.

 

[Gatorchip]

Raven won the Superbowl with Dilfert

 

[Shanemansj13]

A p*rn star thats looks like an ogre with bowling ball tits.

Yeah I never said he should be proud of it...but my guess he is

 

[Rock Strongo]

Given the OP...did you expect anything different? I mean....he failed miserably when he tried to show how 'bad' Garoppolo was by listing QB's by passing yards....yup....the stat that Jameis Winston led in.

rub this in, feel free:

49ers were prepared to offer Patriots more for Jimmy Garoppolo; Bill Belichick never asked, per report

In a recent piece detailing how San Francisco turned themselves into a team that is about to make a bid for the franchise's sixth Super Bowl title, ESPN's Seth Wickersham reveals that not only were the 49ers "stunned" that Garoppolo was available for just a second-rounder, but that they were prepared to offer even more for him in the event that Belichick haggled.

 

[Rock Strongo]

We all know the Ravens dumped Dilfert after winning the Superbowl due to being so limited. His stats confirm that. So I was wondering how his numbers stack up vs Jimmy G. Dilfert had 4 games vs 2 thus far for Jimmy, so I averaged the numbers. Here are the numbers.
Attempted passes per game: Dilfert 18.25 Jimmy 13.25
Completions per game: Dilfert 8.75 Jimmy 8.5
Yards per game: Dilfert 147.5 Jimmy 100.5
TDs in 4 games Dilfert had 3. Jimmy in 2 games has 1

Who has the better stats in the playoffs?

PS

https://www.************.com/commentary/2275-why-jimmy-garoppolo-better-you-think/

In many ways, the Super Bowl is the biggest media event of the year. With all the attention that gets paid to the game and the teams participating, it's no surprise that everyone seems to have an opinion or a "hot take" to bring some attention to himself or herself.

One of the narratives that's currently floating around is that San Francisco 49ers quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo is some kind of a game manager who's just along for the ride. Garoppolo's detractors are pointing to the fact that he's only attempted 27 passes this postseason, and that his lack of opportunities has something to do with head coach Kyle Shanahan game planning around his signal caller.

While the idea of Garoppolo being a liability is gaining steam with the misinformed, anyone who's actually seen him play this year would know that's not the case. In fact, Garoppolo's been everything the 49ers have needed and more in 2019.

First of all, if you look at what he's done on the surface, the numbers were some of the best in the NFL. His 3,978 passing yards were the 12th most in the league and the fourth highest total for a Niners quarterback in franchise history. Garoppolo also finished tied for fifth with 27 touchdowns passes, and his 8.4 yards per attempt put him second overall.

At 69.1%, Garoppolo's completion rate was the fourth best, and is even more impressive when you consider that the 49ers had the third highest drop rate of any team (6%). He was also fourth in on-target throws at 80.7%.

But to really appreciate what Garoppolo's brought to the table, you'd have to look at his performance when his team needed him the most. When San Francisco was trailing, Garoppolo completed 73% of his throws at 9.1 yards per attempt. He threw 11 of his 27 touchdown passes rallying from behind, and posted a rating 115.7.

In the fourth quarter of games, Garoppolo was able to hit on 70% of his attempts and averaged 8.33 yards per throw. He connected on six touchdowns to only one interception, and was rated at 107.1. In turn, it's no surprise that no other quarterback posted more fourth quarterback comebacks (four), and only Russell Wilson, Josh Allen and Deshaun Watson engineered more game winning drives.

And what about that vaunted running game helping him out? Well, in Weeks 9-11, the 49ers struggled to run the ball to the tune of 2.8 yards per carry over that three game stretch. Garoppolo responded by throwing for a total of 989 yards and nine touchdowns to help carry his team. San Francisco went 2-1, and was a missed field goal away from winning all three contests. And winning is something we've become accustomed to with this particular player, isn't it?

As good of a coach as Shanahan is, he's 4-20 without Garoppolo as his starting quarterback and 21-5 with him. The two are a perfect pair for each other and there's no denying the impact Garoppolo has. Shanahan's 49ers have averaged 29 points in the 26 games Garoppolo's been the starter, and 19 points in the 24 games with Brian Hoyer, C.J. Beathard or Nick Mullens behind center.

Is Garoppolo a perfect quarterback? No, he's certainly still learning in a lot of ways and is prone to throwing the occasional "what was he thinking?" pass. But those flaws don't take away from the fact that in less than two full seasons as a starter, Garoppolo's turned into an accurate, clutch, Pro Bowl caliber quarterback who's one game away from a Super Bowl title.

 

[Robotech]

We all know the Ravens dumped Dilfert after winning the Superbowl due to being so limited. His stats confirm that. So I was wondering how his numbers stack up vs Jimmy G. Dilfert had 4 games vs 2 thus far for Jimmy, so I averaged the numbers. Here are the numbers.
Attempted passes per game: Dilfert 18.25 Jimmy 13.25
Completions per game: Dilfert 8.75 Jimmy 8.5
Yards per game: Dilfert 147.5 Jimmy 100.5
TDs in 4 games Dilfert had 3. Jimmy in 2 games has 1

Who has the better stats in the playoffs?

Going by quantity, Dilfer's playoff stats look better (although I have a feeling that the efficiency numbers favor Jimmy by a lot), but these numbers don't tell us much because the sample size is very small. We have Dilfer's whole career to tell us that he sucked. I doubt that the Ravens were only considering Dilfer's performance in those 4 games when they decided to dump him.

With regard to Garoppolo, his numbers for this extremely small 2-game sample size is very deceiving because of how unusually dominant the Niners were able to run the ball. Only throwing 8 passes because your running game is abusing the other team like they were a cupcake college football team is highly unusual in the modern NFL.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

As good of a coach as Shanahan is, he's 4-20 without Garoppolo as his starting quarterback and 21-5 with him.

Shanaham is 2-0 with Jimmy G at QB in the playoffs. Jimmy has made a world of difference I guess.

 

[Rock Strongo]

PS

https://www.************.com/commentary/2275-why-jimmy-garoppolo-better-you-think/

In many ways, the Super Bowl is the biggest media event of the year. With all the attention that gets paid to the game and the teams participating, it's no surprise that everyone seems to have an opinion or a "hot take" to bring some attention to himself or herself.

One of the narratives that's currently floating around is that San Francisco 49ers quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo is some kind of a game manager who's just along for the ride. Garoppolo's detractors are pointing to the fact that he's only attempted 27 passes this postseason, and that his lack of opportunities has something to do with head coach Kyle Shanahan game planning around his signal caller.

While the idea of Garoppolo being a liability is gaining steam with the misinformed, anyone who's actually seen him play this year would know that's not the case. In fact, Garoppolo's been everything the 49ers have needed and more in 2019.

First of all, if you look at what he's done on the surface, the numbers were some of the best in the NFL. His 3,978 passing yards were the 12th most in the league and the fourth highest total for a Niners quarterback in franchise history. Garoppolo also finished tied for fifth with 27 touchdowns passes, and his 8.4 yards per attempt put him second overall.

At 69.1%, Garoppolo's completion rate was the fourth best, and is even more impressive when you consider that the 49ers had the third highest drop rate of any team (6%). He was also fourth in on-target throws at 80.7%.

But to really appreciate what Garoppolo's brought to the table, you'd have to look at his performance when his team needed him the most. When San Francisco was trailing, Garoppolo completed 73% of his throws at 9.1 yards per attempt. He threw 11 of his 27 touchdown passes rallying from behind, and posted a rating 115.7.

In the fourth quarter of games, Garoppolo was able to hit on 70% of his attempts and averaged 8.33 yards per throw. He connected on six touchdowns to only one interception, and was rated at 107.1. In turn, it's no surprise that no other quarterback posted more fourth quarterback comebacks (four), and only Russell Wilson, Josh Allen and Deshaun Watson engineered more game winning drives.

And what about that vaunted running game helping him out? Well, in Weeks 9-11, the 49ers struggled to run the ball to the tune of 2.8 yards per carry over that three game stretch. Garoppolo responded by throwing for a total of 989 yards and nine touchdowns to help carry his team. San Francisco went 2-1, and was a missed field goal away from winning all three contests. And winning is something we've become accustomed to with this particular player, isn't it?

As good of a coach as Shanahan is, he's 4-20 without Garoppolo as his starting quarterback and 21-5 with him. The two are a perfect pair for each other and there's no denying the impact Garoppolo has. Shanahan's 49ers have averaged 29 points in the 26 games Garoppolo's been the starter, and 19 points in the 24 games with Brian Hoyer, C.J. Beathard or Nick Mullens behind center.

Is Garoppolo a perfect quarterback? No, he's certainly still learning in a lot of ways and is prone to throwing the occasional "what was he thinking?" pass. But those flaws don't take away from the fact that in less than two full seasons as a starter, Garoppolo's turned into an accurate, clutch, Pro Bowl caliber quarterback who's one game away from a Super Bowl title.

why does my URL get ***** and useless?

its a football site not pr0n.

 

[Rock Strongo]

what is so bad about "49 erswebzone.com"?

https://www.************.com/commentary/2275-why-jimmy-garoppolo-better-you-think/

 

[HaroldSeattle]

This doesn't tell us much because the sample size is very small. We have Dilfer's whole career to tell us that he sucked. I doubt that the Ravens were only considering Dilfer's performance in those 4 games when they decided to dump him.

With regard to Garoppolo, his numbers for this extremely small 2-game sample size is very deceiving because of how unusually dominant the Niners were able to run the ball. Only throwing 8 passes because your running game is abusing the other team like they were a cupcake college football team is highly unusual in the modern NFL.

Don't get me wrong I think the 49ers did the right thing in running the ball rather then have Jimmy throwing the ball. The results speaks loudly.