- Thread starter
- #1
Mike A. S.
Well-Known Member
Whose side are you on?
I am on the side of law enforcement bodies. Not on the side of the pot smoking and drug dealing criminals who get hold of a great lawyer ( or some influential personalities like J.K. Rowling with zero tennis knowledge to root for them).
Great post btw!
Whose side are you on?
Serena Williams' Reaction To Her 2018 Wimbledon Loss Is The Definition Of Class
"Speaking to reporters from the court just moments after the match, Williams said the following per The Guardian:
"I was really happy to get this far. For all the moms out there, I was playing for you today and I tried, but Angelique played really well."
She then added:
I didn’t know a couple of months ago where I was, and so these two weeks have showed me I can really compete and be a contender to win grand slams. This is literally just the beginning. I took a giant step at Wimbledon but my journey has just began.
Bullshit Poll to satiate the white nationalist and non-tennis fans who populate message boards to take their anger or their whine on a black woman. Obviously there is a reason you put this crap on.
#Trumpcurse
![]()
For the first statement: She wasn’t playing for anyone but herself!
And the second statement:she means she didn’t know if the field improved any from the weak era state and she found to her delight that they still played like crap and she can dominate with her unfit physique like she did before.
When a fat lady is dominating a sport that requires nimble footwork then yeah there is something weak and wrong with the era. She easily lost to the first player that out moved her. Hope others can learn from this.Lol. The twisted and warped assertion just stands for itself. When Steffi dominated before the arrival of Monica Seles Steffi was dominant. It was not a weak era. When Serena dominated it is a weak era. Unbelievable.