Who is onboard for trading up for Barkley?

[deanpet21]

I assume you mean cost would be our 2018 & 2019 1st rd Pick for Barkley correct? If so then no thanks.

well he is certainly not falling to #13. Of course there is a swap.

 

[Sleepy T]

I assume you mean cost would be our 2018 & 2019 1st rd Pick for Barkley correct? If so then no thanks.

You are giving up two picks (#13, next years 1st.) and getting a one pick in return. This isn’t an RG3 trade. You are giving up one extra 1st round pick next year (I think it will be in the #20 range) to get a 8-10 year starter RB. He might be special

 

[deanpet21]

You are giving up two picks (#13, next years 1st.) and getting a one pick in return. This isn’t an RG3 trade. You are giving up one extra 1st round pick next year (I think it will be in the #20 range) to get a 8-10 year starter RB. He might be special

you'd be surprised that no one understand this. Comparing this to the RG3 trade is insane.

 

[Ritzarmy]

you'd be surprised that no one understand this. Comparing this to the RG3 trade is insane.

Awww Dean found someone to listen to him.

 

[Ritzarmy]

We can have a starter this year at #13 and a starter next year with our 1st round pick or you can hope Barkley can stay healthy enough as RB for twice as long as 2 other players we might draft.

I rather have NT Vea and next yours 1st RD pick over Barkley and I LOVE me some Saquon.

 

[deanpet21]

We can have a starter this year at #13 and a starter next year with our 1st round pick or you can hope Barkley can stay healthy enough as RB for twice as long as 2 other players we might draft.

I rather have NT Vea and next yours 1st RD pick over Barkley and I LOVE me some Saquon.

wow. im shocked from a Penn st fan.

 

[Ruzious]

I suppose I would go along with the trade on one condition - the 2019 pick is conditional. If it's a top 12 pick, they get the Skins 2020 1st rounder.

 

[Ritzarmy]

wow. im shocked from a Penn st fan.

Don’t get me wrong Barkley is amazing in so many ways but our team is not 1 Barkley away from a Super Bowl hell we aren’t 1 Barkley away from the playoffs. We need our draft picks. Once again Barkley is a special player but I don’t want our skins moving 2 steps by getting 1 RB.

 

[Breed]

If available, Who is onboard for trading up for Barkley. The cost would be a 2019 1st round pick. Answer yes or no and explain why we do it or not. Thanks

Answer: Nope
Reason: Because Allen's dumb ass would probably trade our 2nd best player and a fairly high draft pick and get fleeced twice this year.

 

[deanpet21]

Don’t get me wrong Barkley is amazing in so many ways but our team is not 1 Barkley away from a Super Bowl hell we aren’t 1 Barkley away from the playoffs. We need our draft picks. Once again Barkley is a special player but I don’t want our skins moving 2 steps by getting 1 RB.

I disagree

 

[ehb5]

I voted yes but it's still a horrible idea.

 

[ehb5]

Being a Penn State fan I am all in. If we don't win then maybe SB can run for 3,000 yards in a single season. Damn the torpedo's, full speed ahead.

At this point I'd just be pumped to see him play for us. Not like this FO or team is gonna get their shit together anytime soon lol.

 

[Sportster 72]

I love Barkley and the possibilities he would add. I don't think it is the move though.

What would make me happy is Vea or Payne in round 1 and Sony Michel in round 2.

 

[Mitziman]

At 5, hell no. At 10, 11 or 12...let's talk

 

[Sleepy T]

Awww Dean found someone to listen to him.

 

[deanpet21]

I voted yes but it's still a horrible idea.

Can you give reason to why it's horrible?

 

[deanpet21]

At 5, hell no. At 10, 11 or 12...let's talk

That doesn't make sense at all.

 

[ehb5]

That doesn't make sense at all.

I did in the other thread.

RB with a high pick is a bad idea.
Trading up is a bad idea.

Putting them together is an even worse idea.

 

[Caliskinsfan]

No, not interested

 

[skinz2winz]

No, because why would you? With Alex Smith at the helm, the redskins need as much help as possible surrounding him. They need as many picks as possible, and can find a legit running back in either this year's draft or next years without trading any picks.

I am absolutely on board for the right price of course. The problem with the team since Cousins/Griffin were rookies (last time we actually had any type of run game) is we cannot run the football. Is that because TWill, Roullier, Schreff & Moses suck? No, because they are actually an above average OL with room for improvement. Add a "legit" LG and the BEST player in this years draft and the run game instantly becomes much more effective. Something we haven't had since Cousins took over at QB which is an effective run game.
So as I proposed a few weeks back, our 13th, Cravens & next years 1st rounder for the right to move up to #5 should Barkley fall is my offer. Anything more required, then no I'm not pulling the trigger nor am I gutting this draft or any other draft for such player. Barkley is special and thus, next year's first I'm willing to part with. The odds of this happening are remote at best.