- Thread starter
- #1
deanpet21
Well-Known Member
I don't know about this guy. I think he will cost a lot and frankly we don't really need him. He doesn't play nose. If he is signed then Mclain will probably be cut but the savings are minimal.
I don't know about this guy. I think he will cost a lot and frankly we don't really need him. He doesn't play nose. If he is signed then Mclain will probably be cut but the savings are minimal.
Get him for the right price and draft either Vea or Payne
Hood should be cut he sucksSo are you cutting the Mac boys? is Lanier cut?
Hood should be cut he sucks
I agree. But if we land Wilkerson and draft Vea that would be 7 dlineman including Lanier. Do we keep 7 dlineman? I don't think so.
Smart teams keep at minimum 7 D lineman when they run a 3-4. Think about it, three starters, 3 rotation guys and one for Injury.
If we land MO we will draft Ridley or CB
Remind me again why Ridley is such a good idea?? Even if we sign Wilkerson, the D-line should be the pick. Fix the D-line and you can build the rest of the defense from there.
ok. but that would be a lot of money allocated to the dline. Plus if Vea or Payne is not drafted we still wouldn't have a NT. I don't understand why the Wilkerson money would go into resigning Brown.
Don't you think Wilkerson would be huge money?
As I just mentioned to Coach, even if they sign Wilkerson.. the smart play is to still draft Payne or Vea. Its no just about a Nose, its about fixing the Defense.. finally.
And that starts with having the horses on the line to both stop the run and get after the QB... which BOTH can do.
It would fix the run defense but we still would have to rely on Kerrigan and SMith for pass rushers. Plus with Wilkerson signed that could mean that Brown leaves and that leaves a huge hole at ILB. McGee and Mclain are not earning backup dlineamn contracts. Maybe a restructure would have to be done. Im sorry but Wilkerson and Vea doenst fix the WHOLE defense.
i like how the mccboys led us to the 32nd rush defense and both combined had less sacks then the raw LanierSo are you cutting the Mac boys? is Lanier cut?
i like how the mccboys led us to the 32nd rush defense and both combined had less sacks then the raw Lanier
now i am not a wilkerson fan , i see some AH in him when it comes to effort .
however , allen ionman payne wikerson and lanier and maybe even taylor / one mcdick boy is ok with me i would go Poe or logan over wilkerson
but fat old and lazy is 396's way
not understanding ?Ummm....did you become coach?