UCF deserves national champion, not Wisconsin

[HuskerOC]

I guess so with those cherries.

Probably taste good on a cheesecake.

I don't like cherries or cheesecake.

Either way.

Good luck to your Tide tonight. Should be a great game.

 

[Red_Alert]

Georgia also beat them by 21 on the same field UCF just beat them by 7, but don't let that get in the way of your narrative.

I'm guessing y'all have forgotten what it takes to be National Champs. UCF is slightly less deserving than '97 Michigan, but only slightly.

Alabama didn't did they?

I think you just made the case the Alabama didn't deserve to be in the CFP.

 

[kburjr]

The fuckin Browns would beat y'all.

 

[Red_Alert]

Oh yeah, because UCF and Wisconsin beat so many teams that were better.

Oh wait, no they didn't.

But please, do continue the hypocrisy.

Yes they did. They beat Auburn who was better than Alabama.

 

[pitman]

We will never know because the “committee “ knows more the the field of play results

 

[4down20]

Yes they did. They beat Auburn who was better than Alabama.

So back to 1997 championships?

Was Auburn better than Georgia when they beat Georgia by more than Alabama, or was Georgia better when they beat Auburn by more than UCF did?

 

[4down20]

We will never know because the “committee “ knows more the the field of play results

Today was the first time UCF played a P5 team all year.

It's not even like when Boise St was doing good. It's like when Marshall was doing well.

 

[Red_Alert]

Wisconsins best win? Was it Northwestern who beat 7-5 Kentucky by 1 point?

And what about UCF? Was it Memphis or South Florida?

But sure, Alabama is the one with the weak schedule here.

You butthurt fucks will believe anything.

UCF's best win was Auburn.

Alabama beat neither Auburn or Georgia.

 

[DeafOranguntan]

I definitely think UCF should have gotten the fourth spot, because I think the playoffs are about the four most deserving teams, and I didn't think Ohio State, Wisconsin, Alabama, or USC did enough to deserve to be there. But to anoint them champions, especially when two of the playoff teams beat the team they just played, one much worse on the same field, is absolutely ridiculous. They hadn't played an actual P5 team until today.

 

[4down20]

UCF's best win was Auburn.

Alabama beat neither Auburn or Georgia.

So back to AP and Coaches poll championships.

Because that was today, not the regular season.

 

[4down20]

because I think the playoffs are about the four most deserving teams,

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Yes they did. They beat Auburn who was better than Alabama.

Auburn also beat UGA in their first meeting 40-17.Pretty impressive win by UCF.To cap off an undefeated season. Yall have to be pretty happy in Nebraska.With Frost coming of a legit Natty

 

[Red_Alert]

Well good luck with that argument.

You guys are literally getting too dumb to take serious enough to debate.

Translation: You have no material to justify Alabama getting into the CFP.

Oklahoma, Clemson, Georgia, (and another team not named Albama) all do.

 

[4down20]

Translation: You have no material to justify Alabama getting into the CFP.

Oklahoma, Clemson, Georgia, (and another team not named Albama) all do.

Alabama didn't deserve to make the playoffs. We lost.

Thankfully, everyone else fucked up more - including UCF. If UCF plays a team or 2 like Auburn in the regular season, Alabama is out. If Ohio St doesn't get blown out by Iowa, Alabama is out. If Wisconsin beats Ohio St, Alabama is out.

Not that complicated and I'm not going to apologize for everyone else fucking up worse. They all had their chance and they all fucked it up, just like Alabama.

If you want to make it a 3 team playoff, then fine.

 

[Red_Alert]

So back to 1997 championships?

Was Auburn better than Georgia when they beat Georgia by more than Alabama, or was Georgia better when they beat Auburn by more than UCF did?

It doesn't matter who was better between Georgia and Auburn.

What we do know is that Auburn was better than Alabama. That's all we need to know.

 

[NU_FTW]

I definitely think UCF should have gotten the fourth spot, because I think the playoffs are about the four most deserving teams, and I didn't think Ohio State, Wisconsin, Alabama, or USC did enough to deserve to be there. But to anoint them champions, especially when two of the playoff teams beat the team they just played, one much worse on the same field, is absolutely ridiculous. They hadn't played an actual P5 team until today.

You have that backwards, Auburn beat both bama and georgia, bama beat nobody of significance all season!!

 

[4down20]

It doesn't matter who was better between Georgia and Auburn.

What we do know is that Auburn was better than Alabama. That's all we need to know.

Then I guess Syracuse was better than Clemson, Iowa St was better than Oklahoma and that leaves only Georgia and Alabama with equal losses.

Should have just been Alabama vs Georgia for the NC game right?

 

[Red_Alert]

Today was the first time UCF played a P5 team all year.

It's not even like when Boise St was doing good. It's like when Marshall was doing well.

Maryland is a P5 team. The Maryland that beat tejas.

 

[4down20]

Maryland is a P5 team. The Maryland that beat tejas.

Oh yeah

I guess that's what I get for using stupid labels like "P5".

Great win.

 

[NU_FTW]

Oh yeah

I guess that's what I get for using stupid labels like "P5".

Great win.

Better than playing mercer.....