Wr's at #66

[deanpet21]

It is very possible and thus realistic for Mims to fall.

I never stated I expect him to fall this far. He is anywhere from the 5th WR to the 13th WR taken based on rankings. I have shown that. I have him as the fifth, but personally, I would take him over Ruggs. What I would do does not make something realistic or reality.

No...the bet was what you stated I believed would happen. I never once believed it would happen, but it could, and this is realistic. Just like your talking heads and yourself wanted Moses at 28 and he fell all the way to 66.

read my original post. I said name a WR who WILL BE THERE at #66 that you wanted. When you said Mims I said he wont be there for reasons that I already provided. You disagreed and that's why I wanted to do a friendly bet.

 

[gkekoa]

read my original post. I said name a WR who WILL BE THERE at #66 that you wanted. When you said Mims I said he wont be there for reasons that I already provided. You disagreed and that's why I wanted to do a friendly bet.

This was your original post...

“If posters on here think WR is a must at #66 please post who you would want and why. Be realistic on if they will be there at #66.“

Let me break it down for you.

I am a poster on SportsHoopla. I don’t believe WR is a must at 66 because that would simply be stupid. I gave you a list of WRs I would want at 66, and some may be there or none may be there.

You then stated to be realistic...which I have shown I was. Realistic doesn’t mean probable. It means possible.


I never once stated Mims WOULD be there. I stated it is possible. You wanted to do a bet because you thought it would show me up; however, I never once believed what you thought. Now, if you want a bet, state where you believe he will be drafted.

 

[gkekoa]

This was your original post...

“If posters on here think WR is a must at #66 please post who you would want and why. Be realistic on if they will be there at #66.“

Let me break it down for you.

I am a poster on SportsHoopla. I don’t believe WR is a must at 66 because that would simply be stupid. I gave you a list of WRs I would want at 66, and some may be there or none may be there.

You then stated to be realistic...which I have shown I was. Realistic doesn’t mean probable. It means possible.


I never once stated Mims WOULD be there. I stated it is possible. You wanted to do a bet because you thought it would show me up; however, I never once believed what you thought. Now, if you want a bet, state where you believe he will be drafted.

Dude. You face palmed me for actually quoting your original post after you lied about what the original post was?

I literally copied and pasted.

 

[deanpet21]

This was your original post...

“If posters on here think WR is a must at #66 please post who you would want and why. Be realistic on if they will be there at #66.“

Let me break it down for you.

I am a poster on SportsHoopla. I don’t believe WR is a must at 66 because that would simply be stupid. I gave you a list of WRs I would want at 66, and some may be there or none may be there.

You then stated to be realistic...which I have shown I was. Realistic doesn’t mean probable. It means possible.


I never once stated Mims WOULD be there. I stated it is possible. You wanted to do a bet because you thought it would show me up; however, I never once believed what you thought. Now, if you want a bet, state where you believe he will be drafted.

Well I don't think its possible for Mims to be there at #66. Prove me wrong,. Bet with me. You also mention Pitttman on your list. I don't think he will be there at #66 either. From what I heard these guys are rising on draft boards. I think we miss out on Claypool too. His stock is rising also. Im just making a prediction that these guys wont be there from the sources that I follow.

 

[deanpet21]

Dude. You face palmed me for actually quoting your original post after you lied about what the original post was?

I literally copied and pasted.

who lied. lol I don't think you are being realistic. lol. Just my opinion.

 

[gkekoa]

who lied. lol I don't think you are being realistic. lol. Just my opinion.

“read my original post. I said name a WR who WILL BE THERE at #66 that you wanted.“. This was your exact statement a few posts ago. This is where you lied. You said to read your original post and even capitalized a portion making the claim your original post stated, who would be there. Your original post never stated such.

You wouldn’t have thought it was realistic for Moses to drop to 66 either, as a late first round choice according to you. He did. It is realistic for Mims to fall...it may not be probable.

 

[deanpet21]

“read my original post. I said name a WR who WILL BE THERE at #66 that you wanted.“. This was your exact statement a few posts ago. This is where you lied. You said to read your original post and even capitalized a portion making the claim your original post stated, who would be there. Your original post never stated such.

You wouldn’t have thought it was realistic for Moses to drop to 66 either, as a late first round choice according to you. He did. It is realistic for Mims to fall...it may not be probable.

I admit I was wrong about Moses draft position, just like I think you are wrong about Mims position. We will see.

 

[skinsdad62]

so go ahead and make the bet and be done with it .

 

[gkekoa]

I admit I was wrong about Moses draft position, just like I think you are wrong about Mims position. We will see.

What have I stated, personally, about Mims’ projected draft position?

I have stated the WR rankings of Mims (8-13). I have stated where I would rank him in my personal draft order regarding WRs (5 Or 6). I have never stated where I believe he will be drafted, but here you go...I think he will be the 7th receiver taken in the draft by Jax at 42.

Your turn...how many WR go before him? Which team and draft number?

 

[skinz2winz]

Lol, this string has gotten ridiculous and NO, Mims will not be there at pick 66.

 

[Stymietee]

If it were me Jeudy would probably fall after this

Exactly how smart does one have to be to play football? (QB included)

 

[Stymietee]

Wonderlic scores for 2020 NFL Draft quarterbacks

• Nate Stanley: 40
• Jake Fromm: 35
• Joe Burrow: 34
• Jake Luton: 29
• Jordan Love: 27
• Justin Herbert: 25
• Anthony Gordon: 25
• Brian lewerke: 25
• Jacob Eason: 23
• James Morgan: 23
• Jalen Hurts: 18
• Tua Tagovailoa: 13

 

[Rowdy]

Exactly how smart does one have to be to play football? (QB included)

With that score one has to wonder if that dude can even read or actually gives a damn.

 

[skinsdad62]

 

[skinsdad62]

wow ,what a statement

 

[gkekoa]

wow ,what a statement

I want Claypool but as a TE.

 

[skinsdad62]

 

[gkekoa]

Denzel Mims at 66 is impossible according to some. I mean, not even in our dreams.

 

[skinsdad62]

 

[Ruzious]

Among Mims, Shenault, and Pittman, I think Shenault goes first, Mims 2nd, and Pittman 3rd. I think Pittman will be there at 66, but the other 2 won't. I'm not a big Pittman fan - don't think he has the quickness to get consistent separation.