7Samurai13
Funniest SH member
Well you went from talking about the 90's to talking about the 80sWhat scale did I slide?
Well you went from talking about the 90's to talking about the 80sWhat scale did I slide?
So were USC or Penn State even punished by the NCAA? They only lost a couple scholarships and only a couple post season games. It's not like they were barred from TV.You mean the decade where the B1G had one NC and it was split with Nebraska. Go back another decade if you want to talk about the B1G never being better.
And just an FYI -- probation means nothing if you run a clean program, so not sure why you bringing that up. This is why I said, they weren't banned from bowl games, they weren't banned from television. It was 9 future scholarships.
If you'd like a comparable coaching to what Saban did at MSU. Look no further than the guy he replaced -- George Perles. He must be one of the greats too.
So were USC or Penn State even punished by the NCAA? They only lost a couple scholarships and only a couple post season games. It's not like they were barred from TV.
Well you went from talking about the 90's to talking about the 80s
MSU has never been on the same level as Ohio State in our and possibly not in our parents lifetime so try and compare the two of them is just ignorant.Postseason ban is the biggest punishment. It hurts you recruiting when you can't compete for a division or national championship and it cost you millions of dollars.
As I pointed out -- Urban Meyer won a NC while dealing with lost scholarships. You can manipulate the roster to open up spots.
And I will TRY to spell it out for you in a way you will understand. You know how Clemson beat Alabama this past year for the NC. If the NCAA were like the NFL, they'd be picking last out of all FBS schools in the next 'recruiting period'. Once everyone picked a player they wanted and Clemson picked last -- it'd go back to all the other teams.
In your 'level playing field' of the NCAA -- the top teams get the top recruits every year. Those schools also have the pr
Did you literally just put in writing that all schools in the NCAA play by the same rules? Conferences have different rules. Hell, individual schools have different rules.
If the NCAA played by the same rules -- schools would have a set amount in their budget. All schools would spend the same amount on recruiting. Individual schools wouldn't have shoe and uniform contracts -- it'd be one contract split between every school.
Quit being foolish.
I just listed the first 5 years for George Perles and the first 5 years for Saban. Only difference. Perles took over a worse team and actually won a division title and a bowl game.
So because of draft order everything is equal?
The team that won the Rose Bowl was a 9-2-1 team. Meaning it went into the Rose Bowl as an 8-2-1 team. I'm guessing it was likely a down year for the Big10.
But the funny thing is - the coach you are trying to compare is the one Saban took it over from and is the coach that got Michigan St in trouble for academic scandal.
All those things are rules the schools choose to put upon themselves.
You honestly can't be this stubborn?!?!
The only rules where it is a level playing field is on the field.
Blue Blood schools are spending 150+ million a year while bottom feeder FBS schools are barely spending 5 million. Why? Because they can't afford to. The top schools every year get the top recruits. Why? Because they spending tens of millions of dollars on training facilities, workout rooms, indoor practice fields, etc etc etc.
Just stop. You are looking ridiculous.
Yes. The team who actually won the B1G. (Something Saban couldn't do) And then won the Rose Bowl. (Or in Saban's case -- ANY bowl. He won zero at MSU)
Yeah -- I didn't mention anything else.
I guess Ron White was correct.
What is the limit those smaller schools can spend as per the rules?
All teams are not equal, but they are given equal opportunity - the same as the NFL.
You sound like the kind of person who would hype up Mizzou the years they won the SEC East rather than recognizing the main factor for them winning the SEC East those years was because the SEC East was extra weak.
There is a big difference between building good teams that achieve success and having everyone else fail around you.
You realize how ridiculous you sound? The overwhelming majority of teams in CFB are not equal. Hence the reason I said -- college football is about who can collect the most talent wins. The schools who can spend 150+ million a year, have monster apparel deals, TV contracts, etc.
CFB is all about built in advantages. It is why the SEC has reigned supreme for the longest time. It is why they fought tooth and nail to stop satellite camps (they don't want teams invading their recruiting territories) and why maybe 10-15 teams have even a semblance of a chance to win a NC in today's CFB. It is why Saban will NEVER leave the SEC. The conference gives him the greatest advantages as a HC.
Btw, on the subject of both Alabama and FSU making it - they play early in the year, so that would be interesting. The loser would no doubt have to finish the rest of the season undefeated. But I wonder how close the 1st game will need to be, as you have to wonder if a 52-6 type blowout by one team might do some damage.