POLL Who will win the NFC West

[jakedog56]

Pretty good I have 5 Championship banners in my man cave.

Wow! You must be proud of your ability to buy a banner and hang it up! Way to go!!!!

 

[jarntt]

"Earned the right"?!? By what? Being a fan of a team that has a winning history? That is some pretty ridiculous reasoning.

"I saw Bob Lily play, so it is acceptable for me to be an asshole"?

No, but it doesn't seem to be stopping you either


Just kidding...

 

[chf]

Pretty good I have 5 Championship banners in my man cave.

I'd listen to you, but there's some Yankee/Canadiens/Celtics/Steeler fans who have earned my respect waaaaaay more than you.

That does sort of explain Hank Kingsley though.

 

[SonnyCID]

At the beginning of the year last year, the Seattle line was horrible. But, IMO they were OK in the latter part of the season and I think they will struggle but be good enough this year. My concern with them is more the skill positions. I know they got good WR play last year and maybe Lockett steps up, but I think they are weak there. If Graham bounces back this will help immensely. My other issue is RB. I just don't think Rawls is going to be a very good RB at all. IMO he is more likely to lose the job than he is to have a great season. But as long as they have RW they will be OK on Offense. Going to be a good battle between the two teams. I'll take Seattle because I think AZ drops back a little and I don't think they were nearly as good as their record last year.

Why do you think that about Rawls? Is it the injury, or there is there something about his game you don't like? Because I thought his game was very complete for a rookie, I didn't see anything on the field to suggest he's a fly by night.

 

[Ewa PGH Fan]

I'd listen to you, but there's some Yankee/Canadiens/Celtics/Steeler fans who have earned my respect waaaaaay more than you.

That does sort of explain Hank Kingsley though.

NOTHING explains Hank Kingsley, N O T H I N G!!!!!!

 

[Scooby-Doo]

So your argument is that the timing of his injury proves he's not fragile?

There is no argument. That would imply you made a valid, debatable point.

 

[Uhsplit]

I have friends who are Cowboys fans. I have friends who are GB fans. Generally speaking they are not more or less of an ass than my (one) friend who is a Jags fan.

But apparently according to your logic my one friend who is a Jags fan (he is from FLA) has no right to be an ass and should grovel humblely at the feet of my other friends who are Cowboy, GB, or Seahawk fans because he "has not earned the right to be an ass"?!?

Hmmmmmmmm...............an ass is an ass regardless of who they root for. Trying to justify asinine behavior based on supposed historical dominance is pretty stupid.

Manster essentially admitted that unless a team has won a SB, those fans rate below the level of other fans whose team has had success. Those poor fans of non winning teams need to hold their tongue until said SB trophy lands at their lap.

 

[shopson67]

There is no argument. That would imply you made a valid, debatable point.

Oh, you mean that point that you have responded to multiple times to debate?

 

[boogiewithstu2007]

But back then there was probably only a little over 100 Hawk fans, you all weren't that bad yet.

lol ... 12's were in full force even back then!

 

[Uhsplit]

lol ... 12's were in full force even back then!

Funny, eh Stu? These guys say that to try to get under the skin. I bet they never witnessed a game in the Kingdome...when the Nordstroms owned the team, not Behring The Destructor.

 

[Scooby-Doo]

what is your excuse for being a complete ass when the topic is remotely about Dallas?
wouldn't you think by now all those folks in New Mexico & Arizona woulda jumped ship to the Cards?
LOL...yep, decades and you still have boo boo feelings

Still hanging on to that one, huh?

Let's try to keep it in this decade.

 

[Scooby-Doo]

This basically summarizes every post you've ever had about the Cowboys
View attachment 125862

Don't take it personally

 

[Scooby-Doo]

Oh, you mean that point that you have responded to multiple times to debate?

 

[PDay8810]

Still hanging on to that one, huh?

Let's try to keep it in this decade.

truth hurts and there aren't many decades you could talk about.
I hear the Chicago Cards were pretty good

 

[Scooby-Doo]

truth hurts and there aren't many decades you could talk about.
I hear the Chicago Cards were pretty good

If I knew it hurt you so bad I would have backed off.

It's a sports forum. Don't be such a delicate flower.

 

[packerzrule]

 

[SonnyCID]

^GREAT song

 

[PDay8810]

If I knew it hurt you so bad I would have backed off.

It's a sports forum. Don't be such a delicate flower.

Deflection.....Nice job.

Three things Scooby.
1. one has to have a clue about what they speak of to hurt one's feelings
2. The Card fans have zero decades to crow about unless you talk Chicago Cards.
3. More Cowboy fans in Texas, Arizona & New Mexico than Card fans throughout the NFL

Pull your big boy panties up, it is what it is

 

[Scooby-Doo]

Deflection.....Nice job.

Three things Scooby.
1. one has to have a clue about what they speak of to hurt one's feelings
2. The Card fans have zero decades to crow about unless you talk Chicago Cards.
3. More Cowboy fans in Texas, Arizona & New Mexico than Card fans throughout the NFL

Pull your big boy panties up, it is what it is

I agree with the first point. You should take your own advice. BTW - Did you just dust off the old VCR and reminisce about the good old days? You can't seem to escape the past.

I only have one thing for you PDay. And unlike you're points, it's actually factual, relevant, and most importantly, current.
1. Cardinals > Cowboys.

It is what it is

 

[PDay8810]

1. Cardinals > Cowboys.

they were last year...you wanna bring up the Warner couple of seasons since you are allowed to discuss the past.

Frankly Scooby, it's pretty obvious you have a deep routed dislike for Dallas and your pep squad Cardinal posts are boring.

Chicago Cardinals, look um up. Those were the glory years.