- Thread starter
- #1
I'm thinking you meant AFCE, am I right.I would say this has to be the easiest pick outside of the NFCE. Arizona is old. The Rams are too young and unproven/bad at QB. I know there's a 4th team, but I can't remember them at the moment.
Biggest issue with Seattle, of course, is the OL. It looks like 4 of the starters from last year's unit (all young players) are lined up to return as starters this year, which is a big step forward. All that unit needs to be is mediocre and this team is back in the NFCC at a minimum.
I'm thinking you meant AFCE, am I right.
I already thought they were a bit old last year. They have David Johnson and swept Seattle last year, but RW was playing on one leg and AZ lost Calais Campbell so their DL is not going to be able to manhandle Seattle's OL like last year. It sure wouldn't be the biggest upset ever or anything, but I think the Cards' time has past with Palmer & co.As for the NFCW, yes it looks like its Seattle's to win, but Arizona winning won't knock me over.
I can't argue to hard but I could see one more run from the cards.Ugh, yeah, brain cramp. Thanks.
I already thought they were a bit old last year. They have David Johnson and swept Seattle last year, but RW was playing on one leg and AZ lost Calais Campbell so their DL is not going to be able to manhandle Seattle's OL like last year. It sure wouldn't be the biggest upset ever or anything, but I think the Cards' time has past with Palmer & co.
I wanted to pick AZ, but in the end I with with the old guard...Seahawks.
Rams...just too far to go in one season with a QB with so few starts.
SF...who is the QB?
AZ...does Palmer have one more good season in him w/o getting hurt...idk.
Seahawks.
If I knew what the Cards get out of Palmer I would definitely feel comfortable picking them. They have the potential for a very explosive offense if Palmer is right and a defense that can make enough plays to win them games. I also feel like Seattle took a step back this year as nothing they did in FA or the draft makes me think they are a better team. They didn't really lose anything either I guess it is more about a feeling of just the locker room not being what it once was.
The SEA locker room doesn't really bother me much...I just think they are getting a little stagnant, but if their OL plays better they have enough weapons, and their DEF is still good enough. I don't like them to win the SB, but if Palmer doesn't roll back the clock, SEA will take it.
Unlike the AFC the NFC is wide open. No telling which team will win the championship.Yeah I'm not expecting them to win the Super Bowl either. Should be a playoff team no problem but teams like Green Bay, Atlanta, Tampa Bay, Carolina, Dallas, NY Giants are all teams I would put above them with a good shot at winning the NFC.
Unlike the AFC the NFC is wide open. No telling which team will win the championship.
If I knew what the Cards get out of Palmer I would definitely feel comfortable picking them. They have the potential for a very explosive offense if Palmer is right and a defense that can make enough plays to win them games. I also feel like Seattle took a step back this year as nothing they did in FA or the draft makes me think they are a better team. They didn't really lose anything either I guess it is more about a feeling of just the locker room not being what it once was.
I guess you did not visit the Seattle board and see the thread on just how much better they will be.
Guess I missed that one. To me this team peaked in 2013 and has been like a slow leak out of a tire since. They are very top heavy contract wise making it hard to add much FA wise and if they are to climb back into that Super Bowl conversation need some huge production from the draft classes to make it work.