- Thread starter
- #1
I feel this game should be a good barometer of where our respective teams are at. Philly has a lot of optimism after adding Alshon Jeffery and some pieces on defense including CB Ronald Darby and DT Timmy Jernigan. But the running game looked shaky in preseason with Legarrette Blount, who looked like a poor fit for the offense, and even with Darby the corners look suspect.
For the Redskins, I am curious to see how the WR position looks. Losing Garcon and Jackson, that is a lot of catches and experience. I know Crowder is an up and comer and Terrelle Pryor is coming off a breakout season, but it still seems like a wildcard to me.
You guys probably saw, but the Redskins started as a three-point favorite and the betting line shifted dramatically. A lot of money came in for Philly with that spread, which was the traditional home-field spread. So clearly some people out there think it will be close/a Philly win.
one game does not a career make dean ,
god forbid wentz might be good right dean ? more broad brushed blanket statementsIf Wentz outplays Kc Sunday there are issues
I feel this game should be a good barometer of where our respective teams are at. Philly has a lot of optimism after adding Alshon Jeffery and some pieces on defense including CB Ronald Darby and DT Timmy Jernigan. But the running game looked shaky in preseason with Legarrette Blount, who looked like a poor fit for the offense, and even with Darby the corners look suspect.
For the Redskins, I am curious to see how the WR position looks. Losing Garcon and Jackson, that is a lot of catches and experience. I know Crowder is an up and comer and Terrelle Pryor is coming off a breakout season, but it still seems like a wildcard to me.
You guys probably saw, but the Redskins started as a three-point favorite and the betting line shifted dramatically. A lot of money came in for Philly with that spread, which was the traditional home-field spread. So clearly some people out there think it will be close/a Philly win.