Rank Em

[TREFF]

Two years. I used Hilton n Watkins last year so this is the last year I can use them the others I can get another year out of

That does help Evan's case, maybe puts him above Watkins for me, but I'm still taking TY

 

[SteelersPride]

Consensus to take David Johnson in round 3?

Rawls 4?

 

[HaroldSeattle]

i agree sir

i just keep coming back to evans!

but i traded two years ago for hilton and watkins for keeper purposes, used them this year

All are good choices and all had down seasons, but for different reasons. Watkins missed games ( and already is battling a foot injury), Hilton lost his starting QB and had to make due with a backup, Evans.....he just screwed up and dropped passes, by far the lamest reason for a down year. So for me it's Hilton, Watkins then Evans. Course the extra year for Evans makes it even harder. I guessing your taking him regardless and you should do fine with him.

 

[SteelersPride]

All are good choices and all had down seasons, but for different reasons. Watkins missed games ( and already is battling a foot injury), Hilton lost his starting QB and had to make due with a backup, Evans.....he just screwed up and dropped passes, by far the lamest reason for a down year. So for me it's Hilton, Watkins then Evans. Course the extra year for Evans makes it even harder. I guessing your taking him regardless and you should do fine with him.

no i think its hilton vs evans

 

[SteelersPride]

no i think its hilton vs evans

colts d is bad, and getting worse, should be passing alot, and gore is ancient

 

[TKOSpikes]

Evans is for sure, imo... with the extra year. That leaves Watkins vs Hilton for me. The fact you cannot keep either next year, added with Sammy's foot and assuming a Colts offensive uptick, and (hopefully), a Bills defensive uptick.... I switch my pick.

Hilton and Evans.

Long term, gimme Sammy, but this isn't a long term question, this is a 2016 question.

 

[tlance]

Consensus to take David Johnson in round 3?

Rawls 4?

Johnson is the only no brainer for me.

Rawls in the 4th is a good value too. Every one of these guys, WRs + Rawls will likely have ADPs within 7 or 8 spots of each other. Sooooo close. They are all somewhere between late 2nd and early 3rd in redrafts.

 

[SteelersPride]

Evans is for sure, imo... with the extra year. That leaves Watkins vs Hilton for me. The fact you cannot keep either next year, added with Sammy's foot and assuming a Colts offensive uptick, and (hopefully), a Bills defensive uptick.... I switch my pick.

Hilton and Evans.

Long term, gimme Sammy, but this isn't a long term question, this is a 2016 question.

i can only keep 2 players for this year, are u saying hilton and evans, NOT keep david johnson

 

[SteelersPride]

Johnson is the only no brainer for me.

Rawls in the 4th is a good value too. Every one of these guys, WRs + Rawls will likely have ADPs within 7 or 8 spots of each other. Sooooo close. They are all somewhere between late 2nd and early 3rd in redrafts.

if rawls wasnt hurt he was a no brainer in a 12 team league.......2 starting RB's

 

[TKOSpikes]

i can only keep 2 players for this year, are u saying hilton and evans, NOT keep david johnson

K... now I'm confused. I must have misread or not noticed the situation.

If you start 2-2-flex, I am absolutely keeping Johnson and Rawls.

Maybe I'll look at what's going on....

Roster
Keeper rounds and years

 

[TKOSpikes]

values are

evans-4
hilton-5
watkins-7
AJ Green-2
Arian Foster-8

David Johnson-3
Thomas Rawls-3(would be a four if i kept him and DJ)

Im thinking

it has to be david johnson and

Evans target volume is huge if he fixes some drops from last year, he BLOWS the others out.....and he didnt have those probs as a rookie, and jameis should be much improved

hilton-again limitless ceiling but i saw moncrief coming on a bit, and drafted dorsett for some reason, although i think dorsett is junk..........

watkins-monster you saw end of the year what he can do, just does he get the chance? and the foot?

Yeah... man, this is tough.

I'm inclined to take the two RB in 3/4

Watkins value is screaming at me, but I don't think I care.

 

[TKOSpikes]

I'm not too worried about Rawls' foot or Seattle's draft choices either. Can't blame them for drafting two players to replace Lynch/Freddie.

 

[TKOSpikes]

Where do you draft in the 1st?

 

[TKOSpikes]

And what rounds would Johnson/Rawls be in 2017?

 

[TREFF]

I'd wanna go in balanced with those 2 keepers, Johnson and Hilton for me, but I sure wouldn't argue with anyone who thinks Johnson and Rawls would be better

 

[SteelersPride]

Where do you draft in the 1st?

to keep it scary, we pick #'s out of a hat at the draft, you dont know until you waltz in

 

[SteelersPride]

And what rounds would Johnson/Rawls be in 2017?

both would still be 3-4

 

[TKOSpikes]

both would still be 3-4

Yeah... this would be my choice then.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Yeah I'd go Johnson and Rawls also.

 

[SteelersPride]

its ppr, most "experts" are projecting rawls as a 3rd round pick with upside.......theres a chance i can get him back, but again, you can only roster 5 rb. granted wr grab you points and tons its a full PPR. so im torn on keeping a stud wr, or rawls