- Thread starter
- #1
Rock Strongo
My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
if that had happened, id have been done with the nba.
Sources: Pacers offered George to GSW for Klay
Sources: Pacers offered George to GSW for Klay
if that had happened, id have been done with the nba.
Sources: Pacers offered George to GSW for Klay
if that had happened, id have been done with the nba.
Sources: Pacers offered George to GSW for Klay
if that had happened, id have been done with the nba.
Sources: Pacers offered George to GSW for Klay
george gets 2 times the rebounds.Yep.
Absolutely no upside to this deal for the Warriors. Paul George is only marginally better than Klay anyway. When considering fit and contract, it is a no brainer decision for GS.
george gets 2 times the rebounds.
"hes the same player"That's your rebuttal? He gets more rebounds?
Jesus Christ.....
"hes the same player"
he gets twice as many rebounds, even moreso defensively.
they arent the same player.
his bullets proved that george doesnt get more defensive rebounds?And you conveniently ignored all of the bullet points provided by @CitySushi which proves otherwise. Klay's the better defender and better shooter who doesn't constantly need the ball in his hand. I'll go with Klay when starting up my team.
his bullets proved that george doesnt get more defensive rebounds?
You are cherry picking one aspect of George's game where he is better.
If I were running a bad team and needed to take either Klay or George to be my franchise player, I would take George. If I were running a good team looking for a second option, I will take Klay every time.
Klay is the better shooter and he plays extremely well off the ball. He is the ideal complementary player. The Warriors obviously have a pretty good team. They need Klay to do exactly what he already does. They do not need another scorer that can break the defense down.
i was just told klays better.
id take george 10 times over klay to start a team
his bullets proved that george doesnt get more defensive rebounds?
No one said Klay is better. They (and me included) say Klay is better for the Warriors. There's a huge difference.
He's probably referencing my post. I should adjust to adding Klay to the Dubs' core before George; given that George requires the ball in his hand and would affect the Dubs chemistry. George is the better player. But for the Warriors offense, Klay's the far better fit.
Yea, you have a known product in Thompson and a wild card in George. No one knows if he would fit in with the current structure or continue insist on hero ball like he does with Indiana.It would have made the warriors worse IMO
heatles didNo one said Klay is better. They (and me included) say Klay is better for the Warriors. There's a huge difference.
Also conveniently ignoring the Free Agency and cap situation factors is a big deal here.