Premium
Member
As you know I am a numbers guy and I love the statistics I found on this site...
The Ringer’s 2017 NBA Draft Guide
My impression is that it is poor luck that they ended up 3 rather than 2 as there is a drop off from 2 to 3 that is fairly significant. The top two guys Fultz and Ball are very impressive.
From the Sixers perspective, I think they need outside scoring more than anything else. They have the big bodies with Simmons, Embiid and Saric.
What they need is a scorer with range and that is clearly Malik Monk. He hoisted 262 3 pointers last year and made 40% of them. None of the other prospects will give you that sort of scoring. Probably not the best overall prospect, but he looks like he fits with what this team needs.
The Ringer’s 2017 NBA Draft Guide
My impression is that it is poor luck that they ended up 3 rather than 2 as there is a drop off from 2 to 3 that is fairly significant. The top two guys Fultz and Ball are very impressive.
From the Sixers perspective, I think they need outside scoring more than anything else. They have the big bodies with Simmons, Embiid and Saric.
What they need is a scorer with range and that is clearly Malik Monk. He hoisted 262 3 pointers last year and made 40% of them. None of the other prospects will give you that sort of scoring. Probably not the best overall prospect, but he looks like he fits with what this team needs.