Jets Trade Up to 3rd Overall Pick

[DHoey]

Great move for both teams, no cost is too high for your franchise QB, and the COlts may still get Chubb at 6

I couldn’t disagree more.

 

[Ojb81]

I give observations:

You come back and say "no idea what you're watching"

Are you a 6 year old?

well, i wanted to actually hear you say which guy you think is this next proverbial joe montana (in your mind, of course). congrats for having the guts to out yourself as clueless, I guess? How's that for a 6 year old response? Does that work?

 

[deanpet21]

I couldn’t disagree more.

Colts could of lost Barkley by doing this. Do you agree?

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

I couldn’t disagree more.

The Jets leaving this draft without one of these 4 QB's would have been a disaster, no matter how good the rest of the draft played out

 

[Nasty_Magician]

What a dumb move for the Jets. Why sign 2 QBs if this was your plan? They didn't give up next year's first so that's a plus but stll feel like too many holes to fill and they would have been ok at 6. Better spend the rest of that cap space and help this guy out now.

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

Colts could of lost Barkley by doing this. Do you agree?

Id doubt he would get past the Browns and Giants, but I guess its possible

 

[Fountain City Blues]

well, i wanted to actually hear you say which guy you think is this next proverbial joe montana (in your mind, of course). congrats for having the guts to out yourself as clueless, I guess? How's that for a 6 year old response? Does that work?

So, a strawman about Montana and more insults. Do better.

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

What a dumb move for the Jets. Why sign 2 QBs if this was your plan? They didn't give up next year's first so that's a plus but stll feel like too many holes to fill and they would have been ok at 6. Better spend the rest of that cap space and help this guy out now.

They have minimal commitments to 2 QB's no one believes are anything but short term bandaids

 

[PDay8810]

3rd pick = 2600

6th = 1600
37th = 530
49th = 410

Total =2540 + 2nd rounder in 2019

Indy won on points but closer than I thought .

the points is a guide line and doesn't mean all that much. I'd rather have the two #2 in a draft with about 15 players with a true first round grade.

IMO...Colts killed it

 

[Judge Fudge]

what an incredibly Browns move by the jets.

 

[cwerph]

As a Browns fan, I hope they go:
1. Rosen
4. Chubb (or trade with someone who wants to jump ahead of the Broncos for whatever qb is left, as long as it isn't a huge drop in the 1st).
33. Guice

 

[Ricky Roma]

Can't truly judge the trade until all players and picks are accounted for and you see some results...but if the Jets or any team going into that trade with a mindset that 'there will be 'x' amount of QB's to choose from'...then they are genetically-fucked in the head.

The chances are good that two QB's will be gone by the time the Jets are on the clock.

 

[deanpet21]

the points is a guide line and doesn't mean all that much. I'd rather have the two #2 in a draft with about 15 players with a true first round grade.

IMO...Colts killed it

What if the Colts lose Barkley by doing this?

 

[DefCONNOne]

Your. QB. Will. Not. Be. There. If. You. Don't. Pick. Him. First. Overall.

Dude, are you having a seizure?

 

[wood20ks]

They have the fourth, but the odds of 2 and 3 being QB's are very high if they took Barkley #1 like a lot on this board have wanted them to do. Very possible their QB is gone.

They're better off cutting out the unknowns and picking what is easily the most valuable position in football at 1 in a year with good prospects at the top that do stand out between Rosen and Mayfield [they'll probably pick Darnold because Browns, but play along] than anything else. They can trade down at 4 and get a king's ransom given the Broncos are picking at 5.

Cleveland in my opinion is better off taking Barkley and still taking a qb............Everyone is talking up those top 3 qbs in Darnold,Allen and Rosen...........If the experts are thinking it could go qb for the very first three picks,then one Barkley should still be there...........Unless the Browns really do not want Saquon Barkley,then yeah they should go qb with the first........but I think they`d make a mistake by passing up on Barkley with the 1st..........

 

[Ojb81]

So, a strawman about Montana and more insults. Do better.

if it makes you feel any better, "clueless" isn't so much of an "insult" as it is an acute observation.

 

[RobBase]

Crazy good trade for the Colts. Surprised Irsay had it in him.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

Can't truly judge the trade until all players and picks are accounted for and you see some results...but if the Jets or any team going into that trade with a mindset that 'there will be 'x' amount of QB's to choose from'...then they are genetically-fucked in the head.

The chances are good that two QB's will be gone by the time the Jets are on the clock.

Just begs the question who. Word is the Browns are drafting Darnold at 1 so that makes things interesting at 2 and 3.

 

[PDay8810]

I couldn’t disagree more.

no shit

 

[tabascojet]

They have minimal commitments to 2 QB's no one believes are anything but short term bandaids

bridgewater and who else? im forgetting....