cdumler7
Well-Known Member
No, I am going much farther. I am arguing no such meaningful difference exists (at least among American sports fans) where the norms as so different there'd be a different result from being "better" or more "loyal" fans. It's not a question of degree- it's a question of if it even exists. Sure, individuals and all, but it's muted as a group. Economics, background, weather, etc all play roles here.
With Pittsburgh for instance there was a diaspora relating to the decline of, ironically, the steel industry. Then of course with the NFL mass media there's inevitably some plain ole bandwagoners since the Steelers have won a whole crap ton of games since the merger.
This same framework works with cultural practices.
I think you are missing the point on some of what I am saying. I do think that some fanbases are more loyal. Green Bay is a great example as there is nothing that really competes with them up there. So whether they are good or bad they are going to have fans supporting them because there is not much else to support. Compare that with a New York or now LA and such where there are many more games in town and they can go with whichever one is more successful at that time. Then I would say look at the culture of the state such as Texas is a great example where football makes just about every person's list of top-3 things in their life...Usually goes 1) God 2) Family and 3 Football. So because football means so much to so many even if the teams stink they are still going to find great support. Houston is having to rebuild a bit since the team left town for a while so it takes a bit to rebuild the fanbase.