- Thread starter
- #1
Judge Fudge
One Pretty Kinky Bastard
My sources (so no one claims fake news ) are Cbs sports mobile and the score mobile
Picks are 102 and 106 (both 3rd)
Picks are 102 and 106 (both 3rd)
Last edited:
Well Seahawks fans are pretty happy. That will teach the Broncos to try to get tricky with contracts. Has the NFL ever reversed a comp pick decision? I don't recall that ever happening, but then I don't pay that much attention to the over all process of comp picks.For some reason the NFL decided to include the entire Russell Okung contract instead of just viewing it as a 1-year deal with a 4-year option like it was actually designed. Good chance the Broncos actually fight the NFL on this one and see if they can get it changed. In the past the NFL has never counted option years when trying to figure out Comp picks. Not sure what changed this year.
Well Seahawks fans are pretty happy. That will teach the Broncos to try to get tricky with contracts. Has the NFL ever reversed a comp pick decision? I don't recall that ever happening, but then I don't pay that much attention to the over all process of comp picks.
They have reversed comp picks in the past. Just a couple of years ago they reversed one that again hurt the Broncos where they took one away after a team wasn't happy.
Great news for the Seahawks. Got a chuckle out of the "fake news" comment, Fudge been spending time on the politics forum obviously.
Well Seahawks fans are pretty happy. That will teach the Broncos to try to get tricky with contracts. Has the NFL ever reversed a comp pick decision? I don't recall that ever happening, but then I don't pay that much attention to the over all process of comp picks.
Based on pay. Smiling widely over getting 2 third round picks.I thought comp picks were based on how the player played that year vs our player who took over that spot? Anyways, two thirds are nice to replenish the depth we so badly need.
For some reason the NFL decided to include the entire Russell Okung contract instead of just viewing it as a 1-year deal with a 4-year option like it was actually designed. Good chance the Broncos actually fight the NFL on this one and see if they can get it changed. In the past the NFL has never counted option years when trying to figure out Comp picks. Not sure what changed this year.
this is 100% conjecture as nobody actually knows the formula they use, but how many contracts even have FOUR option years? thats probably why they gave out the picks the way they did.
he signed a 5 year deal worth $10m per and thats how they counted it.
considering we wont really lose anybody in FA this year, seems like the right year to make one big move.
You know what would be awesome is to not only get that comp pick, but sign Okung to a reasonable offer.this is 100% conjecture as nobody actually knows the formula they use, but how many contracts even have FOUR option years? thats probably why they gave out the picks the way they did.
he signed a 5 year deal worth $10m per and thats how they counted it.
considering we wont really lose anybody in FA this year, seems like the right year to make one big move.
My politcal ideals Aline with Center-Right.
Sorry living my life not just on this site.Apparently Cdumler7 doesn't have any examples for us.
Just because it is secret doesn't mean we can't notice patterns. Players have had option years not count in the past.this is 100% conjecture as nobody actually knows the formula they use, but how many contracts even have FOUR option years? thats probably why they gave out the picks the way they did.
he signed a 5 year deal worth $10m per and thats how they counted it.
considering we wont really lose anybody in FA this year, seems like the right year to make one big move.
Data error, don't think that applies here.